2018
DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ENCOURAGE healthy families study: A comparative effectiveness trial to reduce risk for type 2 diabetes in mothers and children

Abstract: ENCOURAGE was beneficial for reducing BMI percentile in participating children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several of our outcome measures were self-reported, raising the potential for social desirability of response. Participant retention was a challenge, reaching 25% attrition at 12 weeks; while disappointing, this was consistent with similar studies in the literature ( Baranowski et al, 2003 ; Foster et al, 2012 ; Gentile et al, 2009 ; Hannon et al, 2018 ; Sanigorski et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several of our outcome measures were self-reported, raising the potential for social desirability of response. Participant retention was a challenge, reaching 25% attrition at 12 weeks; while disappointing, this was consistent with similar studies in the literature ( Baranowski et al, 2003 ; Foster et al, 2012 ; Gentile et al, 2009 ; Hannon et al, 2018 ; Sanigorski et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Overall, there remains a paucity of T2D prevention studies outside of school settings, particularly ones which engage parents ( Baranowski et al, 2002 ; Hingle et al, 2010 ; O'Connor et al, 2009 ). To our knowledge, few youth-focused T2D prevention studies directly involving family members and led by trained paraprofessionals have been conducted, and those have not been tested at scale ( Foster et al, 2012 ; Hannon et al, 2018 ; Mantilla et al, 2017 ) or were tailored to serve very specific racial groups (i.e., African American( Burnet et al, 2011 ) and Native American ( Chambers et al, 2018 ; Sauder et al, 2018 )).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family-level clustering of these factors, combined with evidence to support parental engagement as an essential component of childhood obesity program effectiveness, 12 have informed the development of effective family-oriented obesity and diabetes prevention interventions for children. [13][14][15][16] Rarely, however, have programs initially designed for adults been considered a means to reach high-risk children, either through spillover effects of adult-oriented programming or familyoriented adaptations that intentionally address child health behaviors. There is, however, emerging and encouraging evidence to suggest that adaptations of the National DPP intervention that also address child health behaviors may be effective in improving children's weight trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, emerging and encouraging evidence to suggest that adaptations of the National DPP intervention that also address child health behaviors may be effective in improving children's weight trajectories. 15 In this analysis, we were able to explore the relationship between only 1 parent and 1 child who were selected as sample household members. We do not have similar information for other parents or other children, in particular younger children, in the household.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study relied on self-report of participants. Subsequent studies will include objective measurements of obesity-related outcomes including blood pressure, obesity, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides, as many contribute to not only obesity but other resulting comorbidities including diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Hannon, Saha, Carroll, Palmer, O'Kelly Phillips, & Marrero, 2018). An additional limitation was lack of a control group to ensure preliminary changes were due to the intervention, instead of extraneous factors.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%