2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities for adaptive online collaboration to enhance rural land management

Abstract: Cross-property cooperation has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of environmental management actions that cut across property boundaries. Online tools can facilitate this and overcome barriers to landholder engagement in collaborative management. However, collaborative online tools need to be designed and tailored to users' needs and values, and landholder participation in the development process is critical to ensuring uptake and long-term use. This article presents a case study from the Central Tabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These can increase the risk of improper adoption of NRM strategies and translate into higher levels of environmental degradation (Morrison et al, 2015); which often extend beyond individual property boundaries and impact at the landscape and regional scale (Meadows et al, 2013). Furthermore, interactions between NRM agencies and absentee landholders can also have implications for surrounding landholders, including opportunities for cross-property collaboration and landscape-scale conservation (Baumber et al, 2018a). As ecological boundaries rarely abide by human-imposed boundaries (Meadows et al, 2013) and global environmental targets cannot be met with publicly-governed protected areas alone (Bond et al, 2018), private landholders have an important role to play in the conservation of biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services (Rickenbach et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Consequences Of a Lack Of Engagement With Absentee Landh...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can increase the risk of improper adoption of NRM strategies and translate into higher levels of environmental degradation (Morrison et al, 2015); which often extend beyond individual property boundaries and impact at the landscape and regional scale (Meadows et al, 2013). Furthermore, interactions between NRM agencies and absentee landholders can also have implications for surrounding landholders, including opportunities for cross-property collaboration and landscape-scale conservation (Baumber et al, 2018a). As ecological boundaries rarely abide by human-imposed boundaries (Meadows et al, 2013) and global environmental targets cannot be met with publicly-governed protected areas alone (Bond et al, 2018), private landholders have an important role to play in the conservation of biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services (Rickenbach et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Consequences Of a Lack Of Engagement With Absentee Landh...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also allow synchronised use between all parties involved linking existing interests and practices. Furthermore, ECTs play a role that does not require strong social commitments, such as existing relationships with close friends, family or neighbours (Baumber et al, 2018). Culturally, ECTs can be used as short-term communication systems among different points, enabling communities to be permanently connected and exchange cultures.…”
Section: The Importance Of Ectsmentioning
confidence: 99%