2018
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal trends in HbA1c patterns and association with outcomes: A systematic review

Abstract: BackgroundThis study aimed to review studies that identified patterns of longitudinal HbA1c trends in patients with diabetes and to summarize factors and outcomes associated with distinct trajectory patterns.MethodsPubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies examining HbA1c trends among patients with diabetes from database inception through September 2017. Articles were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: (a) longitudinal study of subjects with diabetes only, (b) use o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

8
52
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
8
52
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies of type 1 diabetes using GBT modeling have allowed researchers to identify stable, increasing, and even decreasing trajectories of HbA1c among youth. A recent systematic review demonstrated that the majority of youth follow a stable trajectory, while a smaller percentage of subjects follow a trajectory that changes over time . The authors of that review highlighted the need to better understand factors that contribute to longitudinal HbA1c trends; our results emphasize the heterogeneity of factors that predict changes in HbA1c over time across different populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior studies of type 1 diabetes using GBT modeling have allowed researchers to identify stable, increasing, and even decreasing trajectories of HbA1c among youth. A recent systematic review demonstrated that the majority of youth follow a stable trajectory, while a smaller percentage of subjects follow a trajectory that changes over time . The authors of that review highlighted the need to better understand factors that contribute to longitudinal HbA1c trends; our results emphasize the heterogeneity of factors that predict changes in HbA1c over time across different populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The difference in findings may be explained by the more limited scope of that study, which included only 239 youth (9‐11 years old) transitioning to adolescence; youths were observed for only 36 months. Similar to our study, other authors have reported that minority status is associated with higher or deteriorating glycemic control over time . It seems likely that socioeconomic status, family structure and dynamics, and engagement with self‐management might mediate at least some of that association.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…A recent systematic review included nine studies based on heterogeneous populations . In line with the present study, the largest group identified in that review showed stable good glycaemic control over time, containing 44% to 83% of participants . The second largest groups were those with stable moderately high levels (13% to 38%) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the present study, the largest group identified in that review showed stable good glycaemic control over time, containing 44% to 83% of participants . The second largest groups were those with stable moderately high levels (13% to 38%) . There were small groups of individuals who maintained high HbA 1c levels over time (3% to 15%) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were interested by the recent article from Miyang Luo et al, 1 who reviewed longitudinal studies of subjects with both types of diabetes and described long-term trends in HbA1c. For type 1 diabetes, they identified stable, low to moderate (7.1% to 9% HbA1c) as the main pattern, whereas extremely low or high but stable, deteriorating or improving HbA1c were possible for a minority of subjects: 2% to 45% among the 11 reviewed studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%