2018
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal trends in HbA1c in diabetes: Stable means can hide meaningful long‐term changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LCGA is a simplified reflection of the longitudinal HbA1c profiles in the population. However, the individual HbA1c trajectories may be much more diverse and complicated, and the model may not be able to capture all these different individual patterns . Lastly, this study was conducted in a single network of public primary care clinics in Singapore and we excluded a number of subjects due to lack of complete data for analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LCGA is a simplified reflection of the longitudinal HbA1c profiles in the population. However, the individual HbA1c trajectories may be much more diverse and complicated, and the model may not be able to capture all these different individual patterns . Lastly, this study was conducted in a single network of public primary care clinics in Singapore and we excluded a number of subjects due to lack of complete data for analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their mean (95% CI) HbA1c levels changed from 37.6 (36.5-38.6) mmol/mol at baseline to 37.9 (36.9-39.0) mmol/mol at 6 months, 38.5 (37.5-39.5) mmol/mol at 12 months, 38.8 (37.7-39.9) mmol/mol at 18 months, and 39.0 (37.5-40.3) mmol/mol at 24 months. Although individuals in this glycaemia group had a stable trajectory during the study period, some investigations suggested that a statistically 'stable' longitudinal trajectory of HbA1c underlies slow long-term progression to new-onset diabetes [41,42]. For example, a cohort study in individuals with type 2 diabetes showed that the rate of glycaemic deterioration during a 9-year follow-up was ?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%