2018
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing approaches cost-effective? A systematic review of the literature

Abstract: Purpose: We conducted a systematic literature review to summarize the current health economic evidence for wholeexome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS).Methods: Relevant studies were identified in the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EconLit and University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases from January 2005 to July 2016. Publications were included in the review if they were economic evaluations, cost studies, or outcome studies.Results: Thirty-six studies met our inclusi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
216
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 401 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
216
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the most important challenge for this technology is the interpretation and computation of the huge set of data. In addition, WGS requires significant computer resources and well-trained bioinformaticians [135].…”
Section: Mrsa Typing Methods and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the most important challenge for this technology is the interpretation and computation of the huge set of data. In addition, WGS requires significant computer resources and well-trained bioinformaticians [135].…”
Section: Mrsa Typing Methods and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such literature on WES utilization lacks clear presentation of cost data, is limited by small cohort sizes, and use outcome measures that are difficult to translate into health economic policy (Schwarze, Buchanan, Taylor, & Wordsworth, 2018 (Eldomery et al, 2017;Wenger et al, 2017). As more patients undergo testing, further phenotype-genotype correlations will be established, advances are made in bioinformatics tools, and knowledge about the genetic basis of disease expands.…”
Section: Ta B L E 2 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is comparable to other targeted sequencing methods such as WES or Haloplex-based sequencing. smMIPs-based ABCA4 sequencing is a cost-effective method compared to Sanger sequencing (≥€500 for 50 exons) and WES, since it costs~€20 for reagents only (excluding the smMIPs design and synthesis) to sequence ABCA4 50 exons and 12 deep-intronic regions which are 25-50-fold less than Sanger sequencing or WES (Schwarze, Buchanan, Taylor, & Wordsworth, 2018). Other advantages of smMIPs are the low input of DNA per patient.…”
Section: Deep-intronic Variants Identification and In Vitro Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%