2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10120-018-0806-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and tolerability of ramucirumab monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel in gastric cancer patients from the Expanded Access Program Cohort by the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG)

Abstract: In the Korean EAP cohort, ramucirumab showed similar efficacy to the results of the previous trials for gastric cancer. However, the level of GI perforation was slightly increased in the ramucirumab plus paclitaxel group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
43
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In our cohort, ramucirumab plus paclitaxel treatment yielded numerically shorter median PFS and OS durations (3.35 and 7.76 months, respectively) than those previously reported in the Expanded Access Program ( 17 ) (3.8 and 8.6 months, respectively) and the Rainbow trial ( 5 ) (4.4 and 9.6 months, respectively). When considered together with the higher percentage of patients with an ECOG performance status 2 in our study (6.9% vs. 3.1%) ( 17 ) and 0% ( 5 ), these decreases in survival may reflect the application of this regimen to a wider range of patients in routine practice.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our cohort, ramucirumab plus paclitaxel treatment yielded numerically shorter median PFS and OS durations (3.35 and 7.76 months, respectively) than those previously reported in the Expanded Access Program ( 17 ) (3.8 and 8.6 months, respectively) and the Rainbow trial ( 5 ) (4.4 and 9.6 months, respectively). When considered together with the higher percentage of patients with an ECOG performance status 2 in our study (6.9% vs. 3.1%) ( 17 ) and 0% ( 5 ), these decreases in survival may reflect the application of this regimen to a wider range of patients in routine practice.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Among these potential markers, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was shown to be correlated well with the clinical outcomes of patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection ( 8 - 10 ) or received palliative first-line ( 11 - 14 ) and second-line ( 15 , 16 ) systemic chemotherapy. A previous study suggested NLR as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer who were treated with ramucirumab monotherapy or ramucirumab plus paclitaxel ( 17 ); however, inhomogeneous treatment regimen and lack of mechanistic explanation in that study warrant further validation of its clinical value and an investigation of biological features linked to NLR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…From a pooled analysis of REGARD and RAINBOW trials, Fuchs et al [27] reported that 12 clinical and laboratory factors, including a high neutrophil and low lymphocyte count, at the start of ramucirumab monotherapy are negative prognostic factors for OS. From Korean retrospective cohort data of ramucirumab mono-or combination therapy, Jung et al [28] reported that the NLR and albumin are independent prognostic factors for the PFS and OS. Our results also supported these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hazard ratios of PFS and OS in NLR post were higher, which was thought to have greater effects on PFS and OS. Therefore, it is better to consider changing the regimen before progression, when NLR post exceeds the threshold of 5 and they were treated with nivolumab; therefore, the study of Jung et al [ 12 ] and the study of NSCLC [ 7 9 ] that included treatment with nivolumab were referred to for the NLR cut-off value (Table 4 ). Nivolumab was different from the other cytotoxic agents, so nivolumab monotherapy for NSCLC was used as the reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study found that a baseline NLR < 5, which is commonly used as an NLR threshold, was associated with an improved survival in lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab [ 7 ], and in gastric cancer patients treated with paclitaxel and ramucirumab therapy [ 12 ]. We, therefore, used 5 as the NLR cut-off value in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%