BackgroundRecent studies have shown that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with clinical benefit in patients with melanoma or lung cancer. In advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients, there have been few reports about the correlation between irAEs and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the correlation between irAEs and efficacy in AGC patients treated with nivolumab.MethodsThe subjects of this study were AGC patients received nivolumab monotherapy between January 2015 and August 2018. IrAEs were defined as those AEs having a potential immunological basis that required close follow-up, or immunosuppressive therapy and/or endocrine therapy. We divided the patients who received nivolumab into two groups based on occurrence of irAEs; those with irAEs (irAE group) or those without (non-irAE group). We assessed the efficacy in both groups.ResultsOf the 65 AGC patients that received nivolumab monotherapy, 14 developed irAEs. The median time to onset of irAEs was 30.5 days (range 3–407 days). Median follow-up period for survivors was 32 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 34.5). The median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 11.5) in the irAE group and 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.6) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.11, p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 16.8 months (95% CI, 4.4 to not reached) in the irAE group and 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 4.1) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.17, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that number of metastatic sites ≥2 (HR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.54), high ALP level (HR = 2.50; 95% CI, 1.27 to 4.54), and absence of irAEs (HR = 9.54, 95% CI, 3.34 to 27.30 for yes vs. no) were associated with a poor prognosis. The most frequent irAEs was diarrhea/colitis (n = 5). Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 6 patients; hyperglycemia (n = 2), diarrhea/colitis (n = 1), adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), aspartate aminotransferase increased (n = 1), peripheral motor neuropathy (n = 1). There were no grade 4 or 5 adverse events related to nivolumab.ConclusionsDevelopment of irAEs was associated with clinical benefit for AGC patients receiving nivolumab monotherapy.

4049 Background: Recent studies have shown that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with clinical benefit in patients with melanoma or lung cancer. In advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients, there have been few reports about the correlation between irAEs and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively investigated the correlation between irAEs and efficacy in AGC patients treated with nivolumab. Methods: The subjects of this study were AGC patients that had received nivolumab monotherapy between January 2015 and August 2018. IrAEs were defined as those AEs having a potential immunological basis that required close follow-up, or immunosuppressive therapy and/or endocrine therapy. We divided the patients who received nivolumab into two groups based on occurrence of irAEs; those with irAEs (irAE group) or those without (non-irAE group). We assessed the efficacy in both groups. Results: Of the 65 AGC patients that received nivolumab monotherapy, 14 developed irAEs. The median time to onset of irAEs was 30.5 days (range 3–407 days). Median follow-up period for survivors was 32 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 34.5). The median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 11.5) in the irAE group and 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.6) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.11, p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 16.8 months (95% CI, 4.4 to not reached) in the irAE group and 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 4.1) in the non-irAE group (HR = 0.17, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that high ALP level (HR = 2.88; 95% CI, 1.51 to 5.51) and absence of irAEs (HR = 3.06, 95% CI, 3.06 to 23.46 for yes vs. no) were associated with a poor prognosis. The most frequent irAEs was diarrhea/colitis (n = 5). Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 6 patients; hyperglycemia (n = 2), diarrhea/colitis (n = 1), adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), increased aspartate aminotransferase increased (n = 1), peripheral motor neuropathy (n = 1). One of the 14 patients experienced the irAE after discontinuation of nivolumab due to progression of disease. There were no grade 4 or 5 adverse events related to nivolumab. Conclusions: Development of irAEs was associated with clinical benefit for AGC patients receiving nivolumab monotherapy.

One of the standard treatments of resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Nivolumab showed efficacy for metastatic ESCC. However, the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab with chemotherapy for ESCC is unknown. Therefore, we will conduct FRONTiER to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nivolumab adding to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FRONTiER comprises four experimental cohorts: (A) including nivolumab plus 5-FU+CDDP (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil [CF]); (B) including one prior administration of nivolumab and the cohort A regimen; (C) including nivolumab plus docetaxel+ CF; (D) including one prior administration of nivolumab and the cohort C regimen; an expanded cohort. The primary end point is the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities from the initial dose to the 30th postoperative day. Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT03914443

Rabeprazole may be more effective than omeprazole and lansoprazole for the rapid relief of heartburn symptoms in patients with reflux esophagitis.

Objective: To evaluate reproducibility and validity of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to determine the dietary supplement use. Design: Questionnaire data were compared with dietary records (DR) in four 7 day periods for validity. FFQ1 and FFQ2 administered at an interval of approximately one year were compared for reproducibility. Setting and subjects: A total of 361 samples were selected for a validation study of a questionnaire from the subgroup of the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective Study on cancer and cardiovascular disease (JPHC Study) cohort II. Categories of dietary supplements in the FFQ were`multivitamins',`b-carotene',`vitamin C', vitamin E', and`other supplements'. For each category, inquiries were made as to the brand name, frequency and duration of use. A dietary supplement user was de®ned as a subject who used a dietary supplement one or more times a week for a year or longer. Results: Prevalence of overall supplement use was 10.9%. Percentage agreement between FFQ1 and FFQ2 was 91.7%. Sensitivity and speci®city of supplement use by FFQ were 80.6% and 89.2%, respectively. Sensitivity was high for`vitamin C'. When the self-reported categories were corrected, sensitivity for`multivitamins' and vitamin E' improved. Conclusions: The FFQ on dietary supplements used for the JPHC 5 y follow-up survey was valid to determine overall use and well-de®ned dietary supplement use such as vitamin C. Categories must be corrected when determining multivitamin and`vitamin E'. Sponsorship: Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan. Descriptors: dietary supplements; questionnaires; validity of results; reproducibility of results; epidemiologic measurements