Abstract:Study DesignDescriptive cross-sectional study.PurposeTo determine the frequency of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) in patients with low back pain (LBP) and the role of iliolumbar ligament (ILL) origin from L5 in LSTV cases.Overview of LiteratureTransitional vertebrae are developmental variants of the spine. LSTV is a common congenital abnormality, and failure to recognize this anomaly may result in serious consequences during surgery.MethodsAll patients aged 11–90 years of either gender with LBP for … Show more
“…According to the results of our study, LSTV is quite common (9%). Previous studies have found higher percentages of LSTV (10.6-18.6%) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Sacralisation was more common than lumbarisation, which is consistent with other studies (4.8% vs. 4.1%, respectively) [11,14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar to previous studies, the most common morphology of S1-2 intervertebral disc in the normal group was type 2 [17,19]. However, in some studies, the type 3 disc is most common in normal cases [20].…”
Section: O'driscoll Classificationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…type 3 morphology) [20]. Some studies differentiate the LSTV according to the O'Driscoll classification without separating LSTV into sacralisation and lumbarisation [17]. According to the results of our study, this distinction is critical in the O'Driscoll classification.…”
Section: O'driscoll Classificationmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Although it was not statistically significant, LSTV was slightly more common in women in our study (54% vs. 46%). However, in the literature, LSTV is more common in men [17]. Lumbarisation was seen equally in women and men (n = 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There are studies suggesting that ILL extends from L5 vertebrae in all normal cases [20]. It was observed that ILL may extend from other vertebrae than L5 in patients with LSTV [17,20,22]. In the literature, the origin of ILL from the L5 vertebra is significantly higher in normal cases than in patients with LSTV [16,17,20,24].…”
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate whether lumbar vertebrae can be correctly numbered using auxiliary parameters. Material and methods: Vertebra corpus shape, O'Driscoll classification, lumbosacral axis angle, last two square vertebra dimensions, orifice of right renal artery (RRA), orifice of celiac truncus (CT), orifice of superior mesenteric artery (SMA), vena cava inferior confluence (CVC), abdominal aorta bifurcation (AB), and iliolumbar ligament were evaluated in this study. Results: Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) were observed in 13 (9%) patients. The most common locations of the paraspinal parameters were: RRA: L1 vertebrae (45%), SMA: L1 vertebrae (66%), CT: T12 vertebrae (46%), AB: L4 vertebrae (63%), and CVC: L4 vertebrae (52%). Conclusions: According to the results of our study, no single parameter in the magnetic resonance imaging can accurately indicate the number of vertebrae without counting the levels. As a result, we believe that these parameters may be suspicious in terms of the presence of LSTV rather than the correct level.
“…According to the results of our study, LSTV is quite common (9%). Previous studies have found higher percentages of LSTV (10.6-18.6%) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Sacralisation was more common than lumbarisation, which is consistent with other studies (4.8% vs. 4.1%, respectively) [11,14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar to previous studies, the most common morphology of S1-2 intervertebral disc in the normal group was type 2 [17,19]. However, in some studies, the type 3 disc is most common in normal cases [20].…”
Section: O'driscoll Classificationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…type 3 morphology) [20]. Some studies differentiate the LSTV according to the O'Driscoll classification without separating LSTV into sacralisation and lumbarisation [17]. According to the results of our study, this distinction is critical in the O'Driscoll classification.…”
Section: O'driscoll Classificationmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Although it was not statistically significant, LSTV was slightly more common in women in our study (54% vs. 46%). However, in the literature, LSTV is more common in men [17]. Lumbarisation was seen equally in women and men (n = 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There are studies suggesting that ILL extends from L5 vertebrae in all normal cases [20]. It was observed that ILL may extend from other vertebrae than L5 in patients with LSTV [17,20,22]. In the literature, the origin of ILL from the L5 vertebra is significantly higher in normal cases than in patients with LSTV [16,17,20,24].…”
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate whether lumbar vertebrae can be correctly numbered using auxiliary parameters. Material and methods: Vertebra corpus shape, O'Driscoll classification, lumbosacral axis angle, last two square vertebra dimensions, orifice of right renal artery (RRA), orifice of celiac truncus (CT), orifice of superior mesenteric artery (SMA), vena cava inferior confluence (CVC), abdominal aorta bifurcation (AB), and iliolumbar ligament were evaluated in this study. Results: Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) were observed in 13 (9%) patients. The most common locations of the paraspinal parameters were: RRA: L1 vertebrae (45%), SMA: L1 vertebrae (66%), CT: T12 vertebrae (46%), AB: L4 vertebrae (63%), and CVC: L4 vertebrae (52%). Conclusions: According to the results of our study, no single parameter in the magnetic resonance imaging can accurately indicate the number of vertebrae without counting the levels. As a result, we believe that these parameters may be suspicious in terms of the presence of LSTV rather than the correct level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.