2019
DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2019.90227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of spinal-paraspinal parameters to determine segmentation of the vertebrae

Abstract: Purpose: We aimed to evaluate whether lumbar vertebrae can be correctly numbered using auxiliary parameters. Material and methods: Vertebra corpus shape, O'Driscoll classification, lumbosacral axis angle, last two square vertebra dimensions, orifice of right renal artery (RRA), orifice of celiac truncus (CT), orifice of superior mesenteric artery (SMA), vena cava inferior confluence (CVC), abdominal aorta bifurcation (AB), and iliolumbar ligament were evaluated in this study. Results: Lumbosacral transitional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LSTV are common congenital anomalies ( 1 , 2 ). However, only a whole spinal image could detect a complete LZ and allow differentiation between type I LZ and type I sacralization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…LSTV are common congenital anomalies ( 1 , 2 ). However, only a whole spinal image could detect a complete LZ and allow differentiation between type I LZ and type I sacralization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only a whole spinal image could detect a complete LZ and allow differentiation between type I LZ and type I sacralization. If only a lumbar MRI was performed, it was impossible to determine the correct segmentation in 6.2% of the LSTV group ( 1 ). Full LZ might be misdiagnosed as normal spinal sequence, and confusion between type I LZ and type SZ might occur, which might result in confusion between true (type I LZ) and “forme fruste” LSTV (type I sacralization).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations