2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of severity classification systems for oropharyngeal dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy: Relations with other functional profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previous research, we found that the risk of speech and/or communication difficulties was greater for children with dyskinetic than spastic forms of CP, 3,5,7 for children born at term, those with slightly higher birthweight, 1 those who had neonatal seizures, 1 and for children with more severely impaired vison, 1,12 gross and fine motor function, feeding impairment, 1 and non-verbal cognition. 3,5,[9][10][11] The measures that continued to predict CFCS levels in our multivariable models-CP type and distribution, gross motor function (GMFCS level V), and speech (amount of speech understood by strangers)-were similar to the two previous studies of the CFCS. 2,12 However, unlike the previous studies, vision (severe visual impairment) and nonverbal cognition remained significant predictors of CFCS level in our multivariable models after adjustment for other variables.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As in previous research, we found that the risk of speech and/or communication difficulties was greater for children with dyskinetic than spastic forms of CP, 3,5,7 for children born at term, those with slightly higher birthweight, 1 those who had neonatal seizures, 1 and for children with more severely impaired vison, 1,12 gross and fine motor function, feeding impairment, 1 and non-verbal cognition. 3,5,[9][10][11] The measures that continued to predict CFCS levels in our multivariable models-CP type and distribution, gross motor function (GMFCS level V), and speech (amount of speech understood by strangers)-were similar to the two previous studies of the CFCS. 2,12 However, unlike the previous studies, vision (severe visual impairment) and nonverbal cognition remained significant predictors of CFCS level in our multivariable models after adjustment for other variables.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…1 Magnetic resonance imaging studies show that lesions in cortical/subcortical regions and basal ganglia are associated with a greater risk of poor speech and communication outcomes than periventricular leukomalacia. 3,5,8 Speech and communication performance in childhood are both positively associated with oromotor function, 9 gross and fine motor function, and non-verbal cognition. 3,5,[9][10][11] Language development appears highly correlated with non-verbal cognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 Feeding abilities. Assessment of eating and drinking performance was made using the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System for Individuals with Cerebral Palsy (EDACS) 13 (Table 3).…”
Section: Patients Gastrostomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDACS se ha evaluado en estudios recientes en cuanto a su validez en distintas poblaciones pediátricas con PC demostrando muy buenos resultados de confiabilidad tanto entre profesionales como entre profesionales y familia [28][29][30] . Existe una alta asociación entre los niveles de EDACS con disfagia y dificultades al tragar, sin embargo la asociación entre el EDACS y el GMFCS es moderada [31][32][33] . Aún no son muchas las investigaciones que incorporan esta clasificación, pero se alienta su implementación para la valoración de la PC.…”
Section: Métodosunclassified