2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15174-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking integrated linear-optical architectures for quantum information processing

Abstract: Photonic platforms represent a promising technology for the realization of several quantum communication protocols and for experiments of quantum simulation. Moreover, large-scale integrated interferometers have recently gained a relevant role in quantum computing, specifically with Boson Sampling devices and the race for quantum supremacy. Indeed, various linear optical schemes have been proposed for the implementation of unitary transformations, each one suitable for a specific task. Notwithstanding, so far … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the realistic reflectivity, and t, r are the ideal transmissivity and reflectivity defined in Equation 2. The unitary matrices in Equation 5 cannot express the full transmissivity range of the MZI, with errors of up to 2 in the transmissivity, potentially limiting the performance of greedy progressive photonic algorithms [24][25][26]. Our Haar phase theory, which we develop in the following section, determines acceptable interferometer tolerances for calibration of a "perfect mesh" consisting of imperfect beamsplitters [21] given large N .…”
Section: B Beamsplitter Error Tolerancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the realistic reflectivity, and t, r are the ideal transmissivity and reflectivity defined in Equation 2. The unitary matrices in Equation 5 cannot express the full transmissivity range of the MZI, with errors of up to 2 in the transmissivity, potentially limiting the performance of greedy progressive photonic algorithms [24][25][26]. Our Haar phase theory, which we develop in the following section, determines acceptable interferometer tolerances for calibration of a "perfect mesh" consisting of imperfect beamsplitters [21] given large N .…”
Section: B Beamsplitter Error Tolerancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there will inevitably be fabrication imperfections of the photonic components (star couplers, waveguides, phase shifters, beamsplitters etc.) which break the correspondence between the trained software model and the hardware implementation [28], [56]. Such additional uncertainty introduced by physical implementation becomes non-negligible especially when scaling to a large number of components, hence it is important to evaluate its effects on the photonic CNN performance.…”
Section: B Non-idealities and Fabrication Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the effects of such imperfections, we evaluated the degradation of the MNIST classification accuracy of a pre-trained PCNN-784 (phase, linear) by introducing both amplitude and phase gaussian noise to the star coupler matrices F k and the complex-valued filter masks A k . We avoided adding noise to the fully-connected layers as this has been studied in previous literature along with several methods to ameliorate its effects being suggested [28], [56]. The added phase noise ∆φ is zero mean normally distributed with width 2πσ, whereas the amplitude noise is modeled as an additional loss i.e.…”
Section: B Non-idealities and Fabrication Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Ref. [35] shows that integrated photonic architectures affected by standard fabrication and and propagation losses would allow for as many steps of a walk-like dynamics as 32 with only insignificant effects on the quality of the output walker state. The degree of reconfigurability of the large integrated-waveguides arrays is currently very limited, which would put some constraints to the possibility of simulating the effects of noise.…”
Section: Experimental Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%