2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of gamma- and DVH-based in vivo dosimetric plan evaluation for pelvic VMAT treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These gamma metrics have included gamma pass rate, gamma mean value, and max 1% of gamma, to assess errors and patient-related changes. 10,11 The gamma comparison approach has been demonstrated to detect various errors related to the treatment machine as well as the patient. 2 Additionally the gamma approach in vivo has been shown to be sensitive to changes in machine output as well as patient weight change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These gamma metrics have included gamma pass rate, gamma mean value, and max 1% of gamma, to assess errors and patient-related changes. 10,11 The gamma comparison approach has been demonstrated to detect various errors related to the treatment machine as well as the patient. 2 Additionally the gamma approach in vivo has been shown to be sensitive to changes in machine output as well as patient weight change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison was performed by γ-analysis using the same parameters as in conventional linacs (3% global/3mm/50% threshold) [27] . The choice for a threshold value of 50% of the maximum planned dose for γ-statistics is arbitrary, but a threshold is necessary to separate low and high dose areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MDACC calculation of dose is based on the TG-51 protocol [28] Core Houston (IROC-H, formerly, the RPC) for the end-to-end test requires that our institution's treatment plan agrees within ±7% of measured TLD doses in the PTVs, and that that ≥ 85% of pixels pass ±4 mm distance-to-agreement (i.e., 7%/4 mm gamma analysis for film) in the high dose gradient area between the PTV and the OAR. That is, a gamma (γ) index analysis compared 2D dose distributions between film measurements and Eclipse TPS dose calculations [29][30][31][32][33]. The gamma analysis method evaluates the coincidence between measured and calculated dose distributions by using percentage dose difference (DD) and distance-to-agreement (DTA) where the evaluation criteria were set at 7%/4 mm (i.e., 7% DD and 4 mm DTA).…”
Section: Figure 1 (A) Tld Dosimetry Irradiation System Comprising Acr...mentioning
confidence: 99%