29 November 1795 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake, Southern Turkey

Palutoglu, Mahmut; Şaşmaz, Ahmet

doi:10.19111/bulletinofmre.314211

Cited by 8 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…; Tiringa et al . ; Palutoglu and Sasmaz, ) observe. Therefore, these galleries were used to exploit the ores in this district and closed nowadays due to security reasons for human and wild animals (Fig.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 92%

The accumulation of La, Ce and Y by Lemna minor and Lemna gibba in the Keban gallery water, Elazig Turkey

Sasmaz

Öbek

Şaşmaz

2017

Water & Environment J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated the phytoremediation ability of Lemna minor and Lemna gibba to accumulate lanthanum, cerium and yttrium from gallery water polluted by metals. L. minor and L. gibba were settled in the mining water and adapted to separate reactors. During the experiment, the water and plant samples were daily taken and the temperature, electric conductivity and pH of the water were daily measured in situ. These plants were firstly washed, dried in and then ashed at 3008C for 24 h in an oven. Both water and ashed plant samples were measured by ICP-MS to detect the concentrations of lanthanum (La), cerium (Ce) and yttrium (Y). Although these elements are at low concentrations in gallery water, they were accumulated at the highest levels in L. gibba and in L. minor. This study showed that both plants have high ability to remove lanthanum, cerium and yttrium in gallery water polluted by different elements. 75

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 92%

The accumulation of La, Ce and Y by Lemna minor and Lemna gibba in the Keban gallery water, Elazig Turkey

Sasmaz

Öbek

Şaşmaz

2017

Water & Environment J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nalbant et al [22] studied the KM zone (the area between Kahramanmaras and Malatya), which has gathered significant amount of stress during the last 200 years; thus the magnitude of a possible earthquake along the segment ruptured by 1114 (Mw > 7.8) and 1513 (Mw > 7.4) earthquakes is expected to be larger than 7.3. Palutoglu and Sasmaz [18] pointed out that another destructive earthquake in the vicinity of study area took place in 1795 with a magnitude of 7.0 ( Figure 2). Accordingly, Golbasi-Turkoglu Segment, the KFZ, the Engizek Fault, and the Cardak Fault come to the forefront.…”

Section: Seismic Activity and Geological Setting Of Kahramanmaras Areamentioning

confidence: 94%

“…e available structural schemes set the triple junction of Arabian, Anatolian, and African plates at the northern Karasu valley, nearby the study area [17]. e study area is surrounded by active faults of the EAFZ (i.e., Surgu Segment, Savrun Segment, Cardak Segment, Toprakkale Segment, Cokak Segment, Amanos Segment, and Golbasi Segment), Kahramanmaras Fault Zone, Engizek Fault Zone, and Narli segment of the Dead Sea Fault Zone (DSFZ) [18]. e Engizek Fault Zone with a length of 66 km locates in north of the study area [19,20].…”

Section: Seismic Activity and Geological Setting Of Kahramanmaras Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study on the V_S30 and N₃₀ Based Seismic Site Classification in Kahramanmaras, Turkey

Naji

Akın

Çabalar

2020

Advances in Civil Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessment of seismic site classification (SSC) using either the average shear wave velocity (VS30) or the average SPT-N values (N30) for upper 30 m in soils is the simplest method to carry out various studies including site response and soil-structure interactions. Either the VS30- or the N30-based SSC maps designed according to the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) classification system are effectively used to predict possible locations for future seismic events. The main goal of this study is to generate maps using the Geographic Information System (GIS) for the SSC in Kahramanmaras city, influenced by both East Anatolian Fault and Dead Sea Fault Zones, using both VS30 and N30 values. The study also presents a series of GIS maps produced using the shear wave velocity (VS) and SPT-N values at the depths of 5 m, 10 m, 15 m, 20 m, and 25 m. Furthermore, the study estimates the bed rock level and generates the SSC maps for the average VS values through overburden soils by using the NEHRP system. The VS30 maps categorize the study area mainly under class C and limited number of areas under classes B and D, whereas the N30 maps classify the study area mainly under class D. Both maps indicate that the soil classes in the study area are different to a high extent. Eventually, the GIS maps complied for the purpose of urban development may be utilized effectively by engineers in the field.

show abstract

“…Big black arrow indicates plate motion with respect to the Eurasian plate [38], b) Tectonic map of Eastern Anatolia, and historical and instrumental seismicity along the EAF. Historical earthquakes modified from (Duman and Emre, 2013;Ambraseys, 1989;Palutoğlu and Şaşmaz, 2017). Instrumental seismicity from (KOERI, 2020).…”

Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overall Evaluation of the Effects of the 24 January 2020 Sivrice Earthquake (East Anatolian Fault), Turkey

Köküm

2022

Afet Ve Risk Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Turkey is a country where earthquakes are frequent for it is at the junction of a number of tectonic plates. There have been more than 130 recorded destructive earthquakes during the 20th and 21st centuries and they have caused enormous damage. One of the most destructive was the one that hit the east of the country on 24 January 2020. The epicenter of this magnitude 6.8 earthquake was in the town of Sivrice in Elazığ. Sivrice earthquake did not produce primary surface rupture; however, triggered landslides and liquefaction over an area of ~55 km2. The 24 January 2020 earthquake, now known as the Sivrice earthquake, caused substantial human and material losses. Despite the fact that there is a considerable amount of papers available about the Sivrice earthquake, none presents a detailed account of the extensive impact of the Sivrice earthquake its significance. The present study will discuss in detail for the first time the overall impacts of the disaster. It will, therefore, begin with a description of the earthquake and tectonic setting of the area. It then will give an overall assessment of the impact of the earthquake: the direct and indirect losses. Finally, it will review the policy for sustainable management of earthquakes in Turkey.

show abstract

29 November 1795 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake, Southern Turkey

Cited by 8 publications

References 31 publications

The accumulation of La, Ce and Y by Lemna minor and Lemna gibba in the Keban gallery water, Elazig Turkey

The accumulation of La, Ce and Y by Lemna minor and Lemna gibba in the Keban gallery water, Elazig Turkey

A Comparative Study on the V_S30 and N₃₀ Based Seismic Site Classification in Kahramanmaras, Turkey

Overall Evaluation of the Effects of the 24 January 2020 Sivrice Earthquake (East Anatolian Fault), Turkey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

29 November 1795 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake, Southern Turkey

Cited by 8 publications

References 31 publications

The accumulation of La, Ce and Y by Lemna minor and Lemna gibba in the Keban gallery water, Elazig Turkey

The accumulation of La, Ce and Y by Lemna minor and Lemna gibba in the Keban gallery water, Elazig Turkey

A Comparative Study on the VS30 and N30 Based Seismic Site Classification in Kahramanmaras, Turkey

Overall Evaluation of the Effects of the 24 January 2020 Sivrice Earthquake (East Anatolian Fault), Turkey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

A Comparative Study on the V_S30 and N₃₀ Based Seismic Site Classification in Kahramanmaras, Turkey