2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3954-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in phenology and density differentially affects predator–prey interactions between salamanders

Abstract: Variation in the timing of breeding (i.e., phenological variation) can affect species interactions and community structure, in part by shifting body size differences between species. Body size differences can be further altered by density-dependent competition, though synergistic effects of density and phenology on species interactions are rarely evaluated. We tested how field-realistic variation in phenology and density affected ringed salamander (Ambystoma annulatum) predation on spotted salamanders (Ambysto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The colonization of habitats and arrival times of species or offspring in a seasonal environment is important in predator–prey interactions and in forming the structure of communities (Anderson, Rowland, & Semlitsch, 2017; De Meester, Vanoverbeke, Kilsdonk, & Urban, 2016; Rasmussen, Van Allen, & Rudolf, 2014; Salamolard, Butet, Leroux, & Bretagnolle, 2000; Shulman et al, 1983; Sniegula, Golab, & Johansson, 2019). For instance, a large difference in arrival times of nymphs of two dragonfly species causes the exclusion of a late arrival species (Rasmussen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colonization of habitats and arrival times of species or offspring in a seasonal environment is important in predator–prey interactions and in forming the structure of communities (Anderson, Rowland, & Semlitsch, 2017; De Meester, Vanoverbeke, Kilsdonk, & Urban, 2016; Rasmussen, Van Allen, & Rudolf, 2014; Salamolard, Butet, Leroux, & Bretagnolle, 2000; Shulman et al, 1983; Sniegula, Golab, & Johansson, 2019). For instance, a large difference in arrival times of nymphs of two dragonfly species causes the exclusion of a late arrival species (Rasmussen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colonization of habitats and arrival times of species in a seasonal environment is important in predator-prey interactions and in forming the structure of communities [5][6][7][8]. This is known as priority effects, which emphasize how the sequence of breeding or other phenologies determine interaction strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larvae overwinter in ponds, and metamorphose in the late spring and early summer (Hocking et al , ; Semlitsch et al , ). Thus, A. annulatum larvae are typically large enough to be a top predator on aquatic stages of spring‐breeding amphibians (Anderson & Semlitsch, ; Anderson et al , ; Anderson, Rowland & Semlitsch, ). This is important because A. annulatum are sympatric with at least six anurans and two other caudates at our collection sites (Semlitsch et al , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesized that greater variability in breeding phenology of the ringed salamander ( Ambystoma annulatum , Cope 1886) would increase cannibalism rates among larvae due to greater body size variability (Nyman, Wilkinson & Hutcherson, ; Petranka & Thomas, ), and ultimately result in increased body size at metamorphosis, a correlate of future adult fitness (Semlitsch, Scott & Pechmann, ; Scott, ; Earl & Whiteman, ). Because A. annulatum are a top predator of spring‐breeding amphibians (Anderson & Semlitsch, ; Anderson et al , ; Anderson, Rowland & Semlitsch, ), we also predicted that when more cannibalism occurred, the reduced number of salamander larvae would have less of an impact on the anuran community, resulting in greater amphibian diversity. Lastly, we expected that greater cannibalism in A. annulatum from increased breeding variability would cascade to other trophic levels, that is higher abundances of zooplankton due to decreased predation pressure and subsequently lower biomass of periphyton, the zooplankton and anuran food resource.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%