Abstract:While (PA) cross-infection is well documented among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), the equivalent risk among patients with non-CF bronchiectasis (NCFB) is unclear, particularly those managed alongside patients with CF. We performed analysis of PA within a single centre that manages an unsegregated NCFB cohort alongside a segregated CF cohort. We found no evidence of cross-infection between the two cohorts or within the segregated CF cohort. However, within the unsegregated NCFB cohort, evidence of cross-i… Show more
“…Our results found that no major Australian CF shared P. aeruginosa strains were detected in our current cohort. In fact, our study found no evidence of shared P. aeruginosa strain infections, which is in keeping with the published data that shared P. aeruginosa strains are uncommon in patients with bronchiectasis or COPD . The P. aeruginosa strains detected in our study are commonly found in other niches, such as the natural environment and non‐CF infections .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our study demonstrates that patients with bronchiectasis and COPD can release aerosols containing viable P. aeruginosa during coughing; however, no shared strains of P. aeruginosa respiratory infection were detected in study participants. Our results support the published data that cross-infection of P. aeruginosa affects a minority of patients with bronchiectasis [14][15][16] and provides much needed evidence to understanding cross-infection in bronchiectasis, which was highlighted as a research priority in a recent review. 30 Whilst we have demonstrated that aerosol transmission is an unlikely transmission route, it is worth noting that the participants selected for the study were all low producers 26 of P. aeruginosa cough aerosols and also that the study participants had very few opportunities for transmission events to occur during hospital visits, thus reducing the risk of potentially being exposed to each other's cough aerosols.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In fact, our study found no evidence of shared P. aeruginosa strain infections, which is in keeping with the published data that shared P. aeruginosa strains are uncommon in patients with bronchiectasis or COPD. [14][15][16][17]19,20 The P. aeruginosa strains detected in our study are commonly found in other niches, such as the natural environment and non-CF infections. 3,6,14,33 Our longitudinal analysis of P. aeruginosa isolates showed that the majority of participants retained the same unique P. aeruginosa strain over time, which is consistent with other recent studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…13 Yet, unlike CF, cross-infection with P. aeruginosa is reported to be uncommon in patients with bronchiectasis and COPD. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Although the evidence for crossinfection is infrequent in non-CF suppurative lung diseases, 15,16 the transmission mechanism of possible person-to-person transmission events has not been studied previously. Therefore, we sought to determine if (i) patients with bronchiectasis or COPD can produce cough aerosols containing P. aeruginosa and (ii) if respiratory infections with shared P. aeruginosa strains occur in patients with bronchiectasis and COPD attending a centre that is co-located with a large adult CF centre.…”
Section: Summary At a Glancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (non‐CF) bronchiectasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), P. aeruginosa predominantly causes infection in those with severe disease and is associated with poorer prognosis, higher mortality and increased hospital admissions . Yet, unlike CF, cross‐infection with P. aeruginosa is reported to be uncommon in patients with bronchiectasis and COPD . Although the evidence for cross‐infection is infrequent in non‐CF suppurative lung diseases, the transmission mechanism of possible person‐to‐person transmission events has not been studied previously.…”
Background and objective
Aerosol transmission of Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been suggested as a possible mode of respiratory infection spread in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF); however, whether this occurs in other suppurative lung diseases is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine if (i) patients with bronchiectasis (unrelated to CF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can aerosolize P. aeruginosa during coughing and (ii) if genetically indistinguishable (shared) P. aeruginosa strains are present in these disease cohorts.
Methods
People with bronchiectasis or COPD and P. aeruginosa respiratory infection were recruited for two studies. Aerosol study: Participants (n = 20) underwent cough testing using validated cough rigs to determine the survival of P. aeruginosa aerosols in the air over distance and duration. Genotyping study: P. aeruginosa sputum isolates (n = 95) were genotyped using the iPLEX20SNP platform, with a subset subjected to the enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus polymerase chain reaction (ERIC‐PCR) assay to ascertain their genetic relatedness.
Results
Aerosol study: Overall, 7 of 20 (35%) participants released P. aeruginosa cough aerosols during at least one of the cough aerosol tests. These cough aerosols remained viable for 4 m from the source and for 15 min after coughing. The mean total aerosol count of P. aeruginosa at 2 m was two colony‐forming units. Typing study: No shared P. aeruginosa strains were identified.
Conclusion
Low viable count of P. aeruginosa cough aerosols and a lack of shared P. aeruginosa strains observed suggest that aerosol transmission of P. aeruginosa is an unlikely mode of respiratory infection spread in patients with bronchiectasis and COPD.
“…Our results found that no major Australian CF shared P. aeruginosa strains were detected in our current cohort. In fact, our study found no evidence of shared P. aeruginosa strain infections, which is in keeping with the published data that shared P. aeruginosa strains are uncommon in patients with bronchiectasis or COPD . The P. aeruginosa strains detected in our study are commonly found in other niches, such as the natural environment and non‐CF infections .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our study demonstrates that patients with bronchiectasis and COPD can release aerosols containing viable P. aeruginosa during coughing; however, no shared strains of P. aeruginosa respiratory infection were detected in study participants. Our results support the published data that cross-infection of P. aeruginosa affects a minority of patients with bronchiectasis [14][15][16] and provides much needed evidence to understanding cross-infection in bronchiectasis, which was highlighted as a research priority in a recent review. 30 Whilst we have demonstrated that aerosol transmission is an unlikely transmission route, it is worth noting that the participants selected for the study were all low producers 26 of P. aeruginosa cough aerosols and also that the study participants had very few opportunities for transmission events to occur during hospital visits, thus reducing the risk of potentially being exposed to each other's cough aerosols.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In fact, our study found no evidence of shared P. aeruginosa strain infections, which is in keeping with the published data that shared P. aeruginosa strains are uncommon in patients with bronchiectasis or COPD. [14][15][16][17]19,20 The P. aeruginosa strains detected in our study are commonly found in other niches, such as the natural environment and non-CF infections. 3,6,14,33 Our longitudinal analysis of P. aeruginosa isolates showed that the majority of participants retained the same unique P. aeruginosa strain over time, which is consistent with other recent studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…13 Yet, unlike CF, cross-infection with P. aeruginosa is reported to be uncommon in patients with bronchiectasis and COPD. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Although the evidence for crossinfection is infrequent in non-CF suppurative lung diseases, 15,16 the transmission mechanism of possible person-to-person transmission events has not been studied previously. Therefore, we sought to determine if (i) patients with bronchiectasis or COPD can produce cough aerosols containing P. aeruginosa and (ii) if respiratory infections with shared P. aeruginosa strains occur in patients with bronchiectasis and COPD attending a centre that is co-located with a large adult CF centre.…”
Section: Summary At a Glancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (non‐CF) bronchiectasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), P. aeruginosa predominantly causes infection in those with severe disease and is associated with poorer prognosis, higher mortality and increased hospital admissions . Yet, unlike CF, cross‐infection with P. aeruginosa is reported to be uncommon in patients with bronchiectasis and COPD . Although the evidence for cross‐infection is infrequent in non‐CF suppurative lung diseases, the transmission mechanism of possible person‐to‐person transmission events has not been studied previously.…”
Background and objective
Aerosol transmission of Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been suggested as a possible mode of respiratory infection spread in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF); however, whether this occurs in other suppurative lung diseases is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine if (i) patients with bronchiectasis (unrelated to CF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can aerosolize P. aeruginosa during coughing and (ii) if genetically indistinguishable (shared) P. aeruginosa strains are present in these disease cohorts.
Methods
People with bronchiectasis or COPD and P. aeruginosa respiratory infection were recruited for two studies. Aerosol study: Participants (n = 20) underwent cough testing using validated cough rigs to determine the survival of P. aeruginosa aerosols in the air over distance and duration. Genotyping study: P. aeruginosa sputum isolates (n = 95) were genotyped using the iPLEX20SNP platform, with a subset subjected to the enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus polymerase chain reaction (ERIC‐PCR) assay to ascertain their genetic relatedness.
Results
Aerosol study: Overall, 7 of 20 (35%) participants released P. aeruginosa cough aerosols during at least one of the cough aerosol tests. These cough aerosols remained viable for 4 m from the source and for 15 min after coughing. The mean total aerosol count of P. aeruginosa at 2 m was two colony‐forming units. Typing study: No shared P. aeruginosa strains were identified.
Conclusion
Low viable count of P. aeruginosa cough aerosols and a lack of shared P. aeruginosa strains observed suggest that aerosol transmission of P. aeruginosa is an unlikely mode of respiratory infection spread in patients with bronchiectasis and COPD.
Purpose of ReviewThe purpose of this review is to discuss the risk of bacterial cross-infection for bronchiectasis patients in the outpatient setting. Cross-infection has primarily been a matter of concern in cystic fibrosis (CF). There is considerable evidence of transmission of pathogens between CF patients, and this has led to guideline recommendations advocating strict segregation policies. Guidelines in bronchiectasis do not specifically address the issue of cross-infection. If cross-infection is prevalent, it may have significant implications for patients and the practical running of specialist care.Recent FindingsMultiple UK-based studies have now published evidence of cross-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa within cohorts of bronchiectasis patients; however, the risk does not appear to be high. There is also evidence suggesting cross-infection from CF patients to bronchiectasis patients.SummaryThe current evidence for cross-infection in bronchiectasis is limited, but suggests a small risk with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Longitudinal studies looking at Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other pathogens are now required.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.