2017
DOI: 10.1007/s41114-017-0004-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment

Abstract: We review detection methods that are currently in use or have been proposed to search for a stochastic background of gravitational radiation. We consider both Bayesian and frequentist searches using ground-based and space-based laser interferometers, spacecraft Doppler tracking, and pulsar timing arrays; and we allow for anisotropy, non-Gaussianity, and non-standard polarization states. Our focus is on relevant data analysis issues, and not on the particular astrophysical or early Universe sources that might g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
531
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(554 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
(388 reference statements)
3
531
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our search uses a cross-correlation method optimized to search for the background using the pair of LIGO detectors [39]. As discussed for instance in [48], crosscorrelation is preferred to auto-correlation methods because the noise variances in each detector are not known sufficiently well to perform subtraction of the noise autopower. We define the estimator…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our search uses a cross-correlation method optimized to search for the background using the pair of LIGO detectors [39]. As discussed for instance in [48], crosscorrelation is preferred to auto-correlation methods because the noise variances in each detector are not known sufficiently well to perform subtraction of the noise autopower. We define the estimator…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Ω α is the overall magnitude of the spectrum, f ref is the reference frequency while α is the power-law index, which becomes α = 2/3 for GWBs from compact binary inspirals [59]. In such a case with a constant v, Ω (I) GW and Ω (V ) GW have identical frequency dependence.…”
Section: Comparison With a Bayesian Parameter Estimation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cosmological sources of the SGWB include cosmic string networks [5][6][7][8], inflation [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], phase transitions [17][18][19], and the pre-Big-Bang scenario [20][21][22][23]. For reviews of search methods for the SGWB, see [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%