2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Agent Oral Vinorelbine as First-Line Chemotherapy for Endocrine-Pretreated Breast Cancer With Bone Metastases and No Visceral Involvement: NORBREAST-228 Phase II Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Metronomic vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer months, oral weekly VRL is considered as an active oral alternative to intravenous CT in the rst-line CT treatment of MBC(Blancas et al 2019;Freyer et al 2003;Steger et al 2018). It is noteworthy that these results are similar to the results of metronomic VRL regimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metronomic vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer months, oral weekly VRL is considered as an active oral alternative to intravenous CT in the rst-line CT treatment of MBC(Blancas et al 2019;Freyer et al 2003;Steger et al 2018). It is noteworthy that these results are similar to the results of metronomic VRL regimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Among available agents, vinorelbine (VRL) represents a standard treatment option in this situation, as it provides proven e cacy and a good safety pro le (Fumoleau et al 1993;Terenziani et al 1996). Oral administration of VRL shows a level of e cacy comparable to the intravenous treatment, while providing a favourable safety pro le and the additional advantages of an oral treatment (Aapro et al 2019;Blancas et al 2019;Freyer et al 2003;Steger et al 2018). Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT), describing the administration of low doses on a continuous and high administration frequency basis, has been shown to mediate good tumour control and maintain an excellent safety pro le (Cazzaniga et al 2019a; Krajnak et al 2020;Liu et al 2017;Orlando et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral vinorelbine was well tolerated with 8.2 months median progression-free survival (PFS) and 35.2 months OS. 35 37 ○ Replacing IV etoposide with oral etoposide was studied in several hematological and solid malignancies. The reduced bioavailability (∼50%) of the oral formulation warrants doubling the dose oral etoposide when switching from IV to oral etoposide.…”
Section: Recommendation # 3 Switching From Intravenous Chemotherapy mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral vinorelbine was well tolerated with 8.2 months median progression-free survival (PFS) and 35.2 months OS. 35 37 …”
Section: Recommendation # 3 Switching From Intravenous Chemotherapy mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among available agents, vinorelbine (VRL) represents a standard treatment option in this situation, as it provides proven efficacy and a good safety profile (Fumoleau et al 1993;Terenziani et al 1996). Oral administration of VRL shows a level of efficacy comparable to the intravenous treatment, while providing a favourable safety profile and the additional advantages of an oral treatment (Aapro et al 2019;Blancas et al 2019;Freyer et al 2003;Steger et al 2018). Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT), describing the administration of low doses on a continuous and high administration frequency basis, has been shown to mediate good tumour control and maintain an excellent safety profile (Cazzaniga et al 2019a;Krajnak et al 2020;Liu et al 2017;Orlando et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%