Purpose During COVID-19 pandemic, cancer patients are considered one of the most vulnerable to infection since they tend to have advanced age, multiple comorbidities, and are often immunosuppressed by their cancer or therapy. Hence, the Saudi Oncology Pharmacy Assembly has issued recommendations to reduce the frequency of cancer patients’ visits to oncology centers during the pandemic while maintaining the access to cancer therapy and minimize the risk of exposure to coronavirus disease. Materials and methods A qualitative methodological approach was conducted in April 2020 using a virtual panel discussion for collection of recommendations. Results A total of 12 expert oncology pharmacy practitioners shared their knowledge and experiences in managing oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The participants recognized many fundamental recommendations that were already applied in many cancer centers since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak. On that basis, the panelists developed eight practice-related recommendations for action, with a main focus on cancer treatment modification. Conclusions In conclusion, delivering cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic carries significant challenges. This paper addressed suggestions to properly manage cancer patients during difficult times. Implementing changes in practice mandates a national collaborative effort from different sectors to guarantee the quality and continuity of care. The SOPA expert panel developed these recommendations, to ultimately contribute in maintaining access to cancer therapy while minimizing the risk of COVID-19 exposure.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains one of the most lethal and incurable forms of cancer and has a poor prognosis. One of the significant therapeutic challenges in PC is multidrug resistance (MDR), a phenomenon in which cancer cells develop resistance toward administered therapy. Development of novel therapeutic platforms that could overcome MDR in PC is crucial for improving therapeutic outcomes. Nanotechnology is emerging as a promising tool to enhance drug efficacy and minimize off-target responses via passive and/or active targeting mechanisms. Over the past decade, tremendous efforts have been made to utilize nanocarriers capable of targeting PC cells while minimizing off-target effects. In this review article, we first give an overview of PC and the major molecular mechanisms of MDR, and then we discuss recent advancements in the development of nanocarriers used to overcome PC drug resistance. In doing so, we explore the developmental stages of this research in both pre-clinical and clinical settings. Lastly, we discuss current challenges and gaps in the literature as well as potential future directions in the field.

Prostate cancer is the second deadliest cancer in the US and the fourth most common cancer among Saudi males. Patients usually present with non-metastatic disease and treated with localized therapy. However, up to 40% of the patients will experience biochemical recurrence, within 10 years. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is used in this setting to delay metastatic disease. Patients with high prostate-specific antigen (PSA), despite appropriate ADT, are diagnosed with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). A subset of those patients will be presented with a shorter PSA doubling time (PSA-DT) ≤10 months. These patients are identified at higher risk for metastatic disease and death from prostate cancer, which represents a challenging dilemma where optimal management is unclear. Apalutamide was the first drug to get approved in the localized setting to delay metastatic disease from occurring. This review article will discuss the development, safety, and efficacy of apalutamide and its current place in therapy.

Background Few studies have addressed the prevalence and prognostic impacts of KRAS mutations in Saudi patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The present study aimed to address the prevalence of KRAS mutations and evaluate their impact on clinical outcomes (if any) among Saudi patients. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Saud University Medical Centre (KSUMC), Saudi Arabia. All medical records of biopsy-proven CRC patients between 2015 and 2021 were reviewed. Statistical analysis was carried out to address the associations between KRAS mutations and the clinicopathological patients’ variables and survival. Results KRAS mutations were found in 97/194 (50%) CRC patients. In comparison to wild type KRAS tumors, KRAS- mutated ones had shown a trend toward right-sided tumors (30% and 4.3% vs 16% and 1.1%, p-value = 0.032, respectively) and peritoneal metastases (34% vs 19%, p-value = 0.014). Older age at diagnosis, gender, tumor grade, microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor stage (T), and the presence of distant metastasis were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival (OS). There was no significant association between KRAS mutations and the hazard of mortality (HR: 0.653, 95% CI 0.873-1.134, p = 0.131). For progression-free survival (PFS), older age at presentation, MSI, tumor nodal stage (N), the presence of liver and lung metastasis, and recurrence were poor prognostic factors for PFS. There was no significant relation between KRAS mutations and PFS (HR ratio: 0.756, 95% CI 0.229-2.497, p = 0.646). Conclusions The prevalence of KRAS mutations in CRC patients was similar to that observed in previous studies of Saudi patients. KRAS mutations showed a trend toward right-sided tumors and peritoneal metastases. Survival was significantly related to different clinicopathologic variables of the study cohort but was not affected by the KRAS mutational status.

Cancer is widely recognized as a major global health problem and is estimated to rank as one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Saudi Arabia has undergone remarkable socioeconomic development in the past 40 years which has contributed to the increase in cancer incidence. The high costs of new oncology medications in combination with uncertainty of long-term effectiveness and safety outcomes highlight the importance of considering value, in terms of clinical outcomes, relative to cost. We convened a group of experts to discuss key factors impacting the current state of cancer management in Saudi Arabia and to agree on a list of recommendations, with a focus on value-based care, considering evidence, patients, and costs.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction The coronavirus of 2019 pandemic has necessitated vast and rapid changes in the way oncology pharmacy services are delivered around the world. Methods/aims An international survey of oncology pharmacists and technicians was conducted via the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners and collaborating global pharmacy organisations to determine the impact that the coronavirus of 2019 has had on pharmacy service delivery, pharmacy practitioners and oncology practice. Results The survey received 862 responses from 40 different countries from September to October 2020. The majority of respondents were pharmacists ( n = 841, 97.6%), with 24% involved in the direct care of patients with the coronavirus of 2019. Of the survey participants, 55% increased their time working remotely, with remote activities including dispensing, patient assessment/follow-up and attending multi-disciplinary rounds. Respondents reported a 72% increase in the use of technology to perform remote patient interaction activities and that participation in educational meetings and quality improvement projects was reduced by 68% and 44%, respectively. Workforce impacts included altered working hours (50%), cancelled leave (48%) and forced leave/furloughing (30%). During the pandemic, respondents reported reduced access to intensive care (19%) and anti-cancer (15%) medications. In addition, 39% of respondents reported reduced access to personal protective equipment, including N95 masks for chemotherapy compounding. Almost half of respondents (49%) reported that cancer treatments were delayed or intervals were altered for patients being treated with curative intent. A third of practitioners (30%) believed that patient outcomes would be adversely impacted by changes to pharmacy services. Sixty-five percent of respondents reported impacts on their mental health, with 12% utilising support services. Conclusion The coronavirus of 2019 pandemic has altered the way oncology pharmacy services are delivered. These results demonstrate the adaptability of the oncology pharmacy profession and highlight the importance of formal evaluation of the varied practice models to determine the evidence-based practices that enhance pharmacy services and, thus, should be reinstated as soon as practical and reasonable.