2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-017-0099-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of orthognathic surgery on profile esthetics in Class II:1 malocclusions

Abstract: The lower the pretreatment VAS score and the profile convexity angles or the larger the pretreatment ANB angles were, the more the VAS improved. Pretreatment thresholds for consistent improvements were as follows: VAS score < 20 mm, ANB > 8°, and profile angle ≤ 155°.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their approach to this problem, orthodontists are divided into those who use a functional type of approach and those who simply seek to compensate the dentition in order to achieve a stable occlusion that lasts over time [7][8][9][10]. This latter approach is adopted by those who believe that they cannot modify the patient's profile using orthodontic mechanics and that in order to improve the profile one must fall back upon orthognathic surgery [7,[11][12][13][14]. The functional approach, which is unquestionably the option that the majority of clinicians use, also enjoys divergent opinions concerning the type of approach and the timing of the therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their approach to this problem, orthodontists are divided into those who use a functional type of approach and those who simply seek to compensate the dentition in order to achieve a stable occlusion that lasts over time [7][8][9][10]. This latter approach is adopted by those who believe that they cannot modify the patient's profile using orthodontic mechanics and that in order to improve the profile one must fall back upon orthognathic surgery [7,[11][12][13][14]. The functional approach, which is unquestionably the option that the majority of clinicians use, also enjoys divergent opinions concerning the type of approach and the timing of the therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%