2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh

Abstract: IntroductionDiarrheal disease is a leading cause of child mortality globally, and rotavirus is responsible for more than a third of those deaths. Despite substantial decreases, the number of rotavirus deaths in children under five was 215,000 per year in 2013. Of these deaths, approximately 41% occurred in Asia and 3% of those in Bangladesh. While Bangladesh has yet to introduce rotavirus vaccination, the country applied for Gavi support and plans to introduce it in 2018. This analysis evaluates the impact and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors recently undertook impact and cost-effectiveness analyses of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi [13] , [14] , [15] . Each analysis used the TRIVAC model, a static cohort model developed at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine with support from the Pan American Health Organization’s ProVac Initiative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors recently undertook impact and cost-effectiveness analyses of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi [13] , [14] , [15] . Each analysis used the TRIVAC model, a static cohort model developed at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine with support from the Pan American Health Organization’s ProVac Initiative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis, we reevaluate cost-effectiveness studies previously conducted in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi [13] , [14] , [15] . Our objective is to compare the economic impacts of three vaccines (Rotarix®, ROTAVAC®, and ROTASIIL®) as though they were all available at the time of the original analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wastage costs were included to account for drugs compromised by heat, expiry date, breakage and wear and tear. Wastage rates for injectable oxytocin and misoprostol were modelled at 5% based on studies of medical ampoule wastage rates [44]. For inhaled oxytocin, a higher wastage rate (7%) was assumed based on expert opinion that the inhaler may be discarded at a slightly higher rate than the oxytocin ampoule due incorrect use of the device (Table 5).…”
Section: Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed vaccine efficacy for the two-dose schedule to be 53.1% and a single dose was conservatively assumed to provide half that efficacy [15,24]. We assumed rates of waning vaccine-induced protection consistent with the waning observed in the trial.…”
Section: Vaccine Coverage and Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%