2017
DOI: 10.1097/mco.0000000000000387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of adult malnutrition and prognosis with bioelectrical impedance analysis

Abstract: Use of basic BIA measurements, independent of use of regression prediction models and assumptions of constant chemical composition of the fat-free body, enables new options for practical assessment and clinical evaluation of impaired nutritional status and prognosis among hospitalized patients and elders that potentially can contribute to improved patient care and clinical outcomes. However, these novel applications have some technical and physiological limitations that should be considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

15
244
0
11

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
15
244
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional BIA parameters, including total body water and muscle mass, are calculated using regression equations for each population studied and must be interpreted cautiously in some clinical situations, as the BIA algorithm is shown to be inaccurate in participants with very low or very high body mass index (BMI) values or abnormal hydration levels . On the other hand, phase angle has emerged as a sensitive indicator of cellular health, with higher values reflecting cell membrane integrity or vitality of living tissue . Healthy cell membranes behave like good capacitors, which store the current and consequently cause a delay in its flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conventional BIA parameters, including total body water and muscle mass, are calculated using regression equations for each population studied and must be interpreted cautiously in some clinical situations, as the BIA algorithm is shown to be inaccurate in participants with very low or very high body mass index (BMI) values or abnormal hydration levels . On the other hand, phase angle has emerged as a sensitive indicator of cellular health, with higher values reflecting cell membrane integrity or vitality of living tissue . Healthy cell membranes behave like good capacitors, which store the current and consequently cause a delay in its flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 On the other hand, phase angle has emerged as a sensitive indicator of cellular health, with higher values reflecting cell membrane integrity or vitality of living tissue. 8 Healthy cell membranes behave like good capacitors, which store the current and consequently cause a delay in its flow. The phase difference between the voltage and current, caused by the lag of the current penetrating the cell membranes and tissue interfaces, is expressed as phase angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, athletes and physically active individuals present higher phase angle values . Evidence has established that lower phase angle values (<5.0 degrees) may indicate inflammation, dysfunction, and cell damage …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase angle is positively correlated with lean body mass and body cell mass and negatively correlated to the extracellular‐to‐intracellular fluid ratio (ECW/ICW) in healthy adults. As disease‐related malnutrition is classically characterized by an increase ECW/ICW and decreased body cell mass, malnutrition (assessed by pre‐albumin, albumin, and malnutrition questionnaires [SGA and nutrition risk score in the ICU]) has been shown to be negatively correlated with phase angle . Due to the contributions of age, sex, and BMI to phase angle measurements, reference values were established and validated in order to calculate the standardized phase angle (SPhA), which controls for these variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As disease-related malnutrition is classically characterized by an increase ECW/ ICW and decreased body cell mass, malnutrition (assessed by pre-albumin, albumin, and malnutrition questionnaires [SGA and nutrition risk score in the ICU]) has been shown to be negatively correlated with phase angle. [23][24][25][26][27] Due to the contributions of age, sex, and BMI to phase angle measurements, reference values were established and validated in order to calculate the standardized phase angle (SPhA), which controls for these variables. Standardized phase angle has proven to be a strong prognostic marker for various survival outcomes in numerous solid malignancies (lung, head and neck, pancreatic, breast, and gastrointestinal) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%