2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10529-017-2301-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-cultivation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with Azotobacter chroococcum improved H2 production

Abstract: Azotobacter chroococcum improved the H production of the co-cultures by decreasing the O content and increasing the growth and starch content of the algae and the hydrogenase activity of the co-cultures relative to those of pure algal cultures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 ). A similar effect on improvement of H 2 production in green alga has been observed in several previously reported studies [ 38 , 39 ], which used the co-cultivation of a fermentative bacterium to reduce the O 2 content and enhance the H 2 production in these cells. This improvement in H 2 productivity of our transgenic algae was comparable with reported methods under sulfur-replete conditions [ 40 , 41 ]; however, some factors might still account for the less significant yield of photobio-H 2 production by this transgenic alga when compared with sulfur-deprived cells [ 11 , 24 26 ] or D1 mutants [ 34 ]: (i) although a very effective knock-down effect of amiRNA-D1 on its target gene (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…6 ). A similar effect on improvement of H 2 production in green alga has been observed in several previously reported studies [ 38 , 39 ], which used the co-cultivation of a fermentative bacterium to reduce the O 2 content and enhance the H 2 production in these cells. This improvement in H 2 productivity of our transgenic algae was comparable with reported methods under sulfur-replete conditions [ 40 , 41 ]; however, some factors might still account for the less significant yield of photobio-H 2 production by this transgenic alga when compared with sulfur-deprived cells [ 11 , 24 26 ] or D1 mutants [ 34 ]: (i) although a very effective knock-down effect of amiRNA-D1 on its target gene (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The strains in the mixed bacterial system are thus interdependent, which provides the co-culture system some advantages compared with pure culture: the robustness of the culture system is enhanced [ 77 ]; the utilization efficiency of substrates in production processes is improved [ 78 ]; the production capacity of high value-added biochemical products are increased; the costs of carbon sources are saved [ 79 ]. The co-culture system plays important roles in environmental governance and microbial cell factories and has a broad range of applications, e.g., sewage treatment [ 80 ], soil remediation [ 81 ], biodegradation [ 82 , 83 ], fatty acids production [ 84 ], sugar production [ 85 ], fuel production [ 86 , 87 ], etc.…”
Section: Enabling Technologies For Light-driven Synthetic Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the co-culture of a growth-promoting bacterium can help increase the biomass content and respiratory rates in microalgae. [67] Second, the bacterial metabolism reduced oxygen concentration of the culture both in the headspace of the reactor and as dissolved oxygen in the culture. [68] Third, the in vitro hydrogenase activity of the microalgae in the co-culture is comparatively higher due to the sustained anaerobic conditions.…”
Section: Laboratory/research and Development Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[69] Fourth, bacterial co-culture enhances the intracellular starch content of microalgae providing increased substrate for respiration and increased supply of reductant. [67,69] Another way to eliminate photosynthetic oxygen is to add chemical agents that can remove oxygen. The catch is that the chemical should not be inhibitory or toxic towards microalgal growth, since they could produce huge amounts of ROS rendering it non-viable for long term applications.…”
Section: Laboratory/research and Development Stagementioning
confidence: 99%