Abstract:BackgroundThe World Conference on Tobacco or Health (WCTOH) is held every three years to foster communication and collaboration on global tobacco control. Very little is known about the nature of interactions between WCTOH attendees and their linkages to tobacco control organizations, so knowing this information could help improve tobacco control efforts.MethodsAt the 2015 WCTOH, we implemented an online survey to assess barriers to global tobacco control activities, which information sources they use for toba… Show more
“…The specific research questions were drawn primarily from network-analysis studies dedicated to improving tobacco control efforts that have been previously implemented by members of the research team [15][16][17][18][19][20] and that were informed by participants of the 2015 World Conference on Tobacco or Health [20] as well as standard network research design. [21] Researchers at the Mayo Clinic, U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI), Arizona State University, and University of Southern California developed the survey in collaboration with the WHO Regional Offices in Africa and the Eastern Mediterranean and the Center for Tobacco Control in Africa (CTCA).…”
Background To understand the state of tobacco control efforts across Africa, a first-ever survey was implemented to assess the nature and activities of tobacco control stakeholders across the African continent. Methods A survey in English, Arabic, and French was made available to individuals and organizations to assess the types and scope of tobacco control efforts and experience with tobacco control programs based on FCTC articles/MPOWER components. Results There were 219 respondents from 32 African and 6 non-African countries. Research and advocacy were the most reported activities, and several organizations emerged as network nodes for connecting tobacco control efforts across multiple African countries. The most common FCTC articles/MPOWER components worked on were (W) warning about the dangers of tobacco (58%), (M) monitor tobacco use and policies (49%), and (P) protection against secondhand smoke exposure (47%). Significant between-country differences were also found on some FCTC articles/MPOWER components: (1) (R) price and tax measures [Articles 6 and 15] (F=1.57, p=0.048), (2) industry interference [Article 5.3] (F=1.62, p=0.038), and (3) economically viable alternatives to tobacco growing [Article 17] (F=1.94, p=0.007). Discussion This study found a broad and robust tobacco control network across Africa, with multiple organizations serving those networks and having overlapping collaborations. There is considerable variability in tobacco control priorities and networking, and multiple barriers were identified to expanding the network and to fostering increased tobacco control efforts. The results point to important directions for increasing collaboration across FCTC articles/MPOWER components to improve tobacco control efforts; potential research opportunities, including an analysis of tobacco industry activities, an exploration of ways to help people quit tobacco, and approaches to elevate the cost of tobacco; and a solid tobacco control network foundation on which to build. However, exploring creative approaches to increase research most relevant to specific countries and their cultural characteristics is essential.
“…The specific research questions were drawn primarily from network-analysis studies dedicated to improving tobacco control efforts that have been previously implemented by members of the research team [15][16][17][18][19][20] and that were informed by participants of the 2015 World Conference on Tobacco or Health [20] as well as standard network research design. [21] Researchers at the Mayo Clinic, U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI), Arizona State University, and University of Southern California developed the survey in collaboration with the WHO Regional Offices in Africa and the Eastern Mediterranean and the Center for Tobacco Control in Africa (CTCA).…”
Background To understand the state of tobacco control efforts across Africa, a first-ever survey was implemented to assess the nature and activities of tobacco control stakeholders across the African continent. Methods A survey in English, Arabic, and French was made available to individuals and organizations to assess the types and scope of tobacco control efforts and experience with tobacco control programs based on FCTC articles/MPOWER components. Results There were 219 respondents from 32 African and 6 non-African countries. Research and advocacy were the most reported activities, and several organizations emerged as network nodes for connecting tobacco control efforts across multiple African countries. The most common FCTC articles/MPOWER components worked on were (W) warning about the dangers of tobacco (58%), (M) monitor tobacco use and policies (49%), and (P) protection against secondhand smoke exposure (47%). Significant between-country differences were also found on some FCTC articles/MPOWER components: (1) (R) price and tax measures [Articles 6 and 15] (F=1.57, p=0.048), (2) industry interference [Article 5.3] (F=1.62, p=0.038), and (3) economically viable alternatives to tobacco growing [Article 17] (F=1.94, p=0.007). Discussion This study found a broad and robust tobacco control network across Africa, with multiple organizations serving those networks and having overlapping collaborations. There is considerable variability in tobacco control priorities and networking, and multiple barriers were identified to expanding the network and to fostering increased tobacco control efforts. The results point to important directions for increasing collaboration across FCTC articles/MPOWER components to improve tobacco control efforts; potential research opportunities, including an analysis of tobacco industry activities, an exploration of ways to help people quit tobacco, and approaches to elevate the cost of tobacco; and a solid tobacco control network foundation on which to build. However, exploring creative approaches to increase research most relevant to specific countries and their cultural characteristics is essential.
“…11 Similarly, with respect to nicotine and tobacco research, collaborative efforts to improve tobacco control efforts on a global level have been emphasized, especially in regions such as low-and middle-income countries. 12 Impactful collaborative efforts are also represented by The International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (http://www.itcproject.org) which was initiated in the early 2000s as the first-ever international cohort study of tobacco use.…”
Section: Collaborative and Global Research Effortsmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.