Rethinking the Career Landscape for Nicotine and Tobacco Trainees and Early Career Professionals

Kleykamp, Bethea A.; Gipson, Cassandra D.; Maynard, Olivia; Treur, Jorien L.; Oliver, Jason A.

doi:10.1093/ntr/nty041

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although there is abundant literature on effective mentorship and career development in science, 18 there are still limited resources specifically addressing these issues in the context of TRS. 5 , 6 , 19 Timely perspectives from TRS trainees have identified evolving needs and the importance of ensuring that training programs, mentors, mentees, peer reviewers, and editors stay aware of these issues and actively work to keep scientific process, debate, and career guidance at the center of mentorship.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidance for Addressing Conflicts, Bias, and Growth in Early Career Tobacco Regulatory Science Training Through Mentorship

Stroup,

Villanti,

Pfund

et al. 2023

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidance for Addressing Conflicts, Bias, and Growth in Early Career Tobacco Regulatory Science Training Through Mentorship

Stroup,

Villanti,

Pfund

et al. 2023

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…While the number of women in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) careers overall has slowly been increasing, less progress has been made among women of color and other underrepresented minority women (Armstrong and Jovanovic, 2015). Further, women in STEM-related occupations, including tobacco and nicotine science, are more likely to leave their field for others (Kleykamp et al , 2019). Gender inequity is also widespread in global health leadership.…”

Section: Persistent Sex and Gender Gaps In Tobacco Control And Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

Gender, women, and the future of tobacco control

Solomon

2020

DAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to provide a gendered analysis of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) benchmarked upon the global commitments to women’s health and well-being in the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. It reviews evidence of the global consequences of neglecting women’s tobacco use and health, as well as analyzes persistent issues related to sex and gender that compromise the efficacy of tobacco control and science. Actionable recommendations are made to the Conference of the Parties to the FCTC and other key stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach This paper draws upon empirical studies, literature reviews and global health data at the varying intersections of gender, sex, tobacco and global health. Findings The global tobacco control framework and its implementation by state governments have been largely gender blind to date with dire health and economic consequences, including inequitable positive outcomes for men compared to women, and an increase in women’s smoking with associated morbidity and mortality. Gender equitable progress in combatting the tobacco epidemic will not be possible without resolving the gender bias, stigmatization, sexism and lack of intersectionality that plague tobacco control policy, research and interventions for cessation and harm reduction. Originality/value This paper provides an updated global overview of current trends in women’s tobacco use and comprehensively details the persistent structural barriers in tobacco control and science that limit their capacity to effectively analyze and address tobacco use and its impact on women.

show abstract

“…In order to reduce the public health burden of tobacco in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has committed to support science and research to further understand tobacco use and associated risks 2 . In 2013, the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products and the National Institutes of Health awarded several institutions research grants to produce the evidence-base required for tobacco product regulation to protect public health 3 . The interagency collaboration launched the Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science (TCORS); 14 centers in 2013 (TCORS 1.0) and nine centers in 2018 (TCORS 2.0) were funded to provide scientific evidence for tobacco product regulation 4,5 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fostering Tobacco Regulatory Team Science through a multisite, virtual fellowship program for early-career researchers

Ajayi

Childs

Remein

et al. 2022

J. Clin. Trans. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Rethinking the Career Landscape for Nicotine and Tobacco Trainees and Early Career Professionals

Cited by 3 publications

References 21 publications

Guidance for Addressing Conflicts, Bias, and Growth in Early Career Tobacco Regulatory Science Training Through Mentorship

Guidance for Addressing Conflicts, Bias, and Growth in Early Career Tobacco Regulatory Science Training Through Mentorship

Gender, women, and the future of tobacco control

Fostering Tobacco Regulatory Team Science through a multisite, virtual fellowship program for early-career researchers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About