2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of a high potency O 1 Manisa foot-and-mouth disease vaccine in cattle against heterologous challenge with a field virus from the O/ME-SA/Ind-2001 lineage collected in North Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, managers of vaccine banks should not require vaccine of >6 PD 50 /dose but should know the homologous potency to be able to predict the protection against circulating field viruses, using in-vitro vaccine matching results (e.g., r 1 -value) as predictor of the cross-protection-ratio. Although in this study and a previous study [22] the cross-protection-ratio matches reasonably well with the r 1 -value, more research is needed to validate this for more strains, especially as the variation in both r 1 -value determination and potency tests is considerable [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, managers of vaccine banks should not require vaccine of >6 PD 50 /dose but should know the homologous potency to be able to predict the protection against circulating field viruses, using in-vitro vaccine matching results (e.g., r 1 -value) as predictor of the cross-protection-ratio. Although in this study and a previous study [22] the cross-protection-ratio matches reasonably well with the r 1 -value, more research is needed to validate this for more strains, especially as the variation in both r 1 -value determination and potency tests is considerable [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The formula above shows that under the assumption that one should have at least 3 PD 50 /dose against the heterologous field virus; the cross-protection-ratio (and probably the r 1 -value) should not be below 0.5. However, the homologous potency of emergency vaccines is often much larger than 6 PD 50 /dose [6][7][8][9]22]. Therefore, managers of vaccine banks should not require vaccine of >6 PD 50 /dose but should know the homologous potency to be able to predict the protection against circulating field viruses, using in-vitro vaccine matching results (e.g., r 1 -value) as predictor of the cross-protection-ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…r1-value) as predictor of the cross-protection-ratio. Although in this study and a previous study [22] the cross-protection-ratio matches reasonably well with the r1-value, more research is needed to validate this for more strains, especially as the variation in both r1-value determination and potency tests is considerable [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Cross-protection-ratio =supporting
confidence: 67%
“…The formula above shows that under the assumption that one should have at least 3 PD50/dose against the heterologous field virus; the cross-protectionratio (and probably the r1-value) should not be below 0.5. However, the homologous potency of emergency vaccines is often much larger than 6 PD50/dose [6][7][8][9]22]. Therefore, managers of vaccine banks should not require vaccine of >6 PD50/dose but should know the homologous potency to be able to predict the protection against circulating field viruses, using in-vitro vaccine matching results (e.g.…”
Section: Cross-protection-ratio =mentioning
confidence: 99%