Introducing a Favourite Tip Definition  and Projection with Tripod Suture in  Rhinoplasty

Motamed, Sadrollah; Otaghvar, Hamidreza Alizadeh; Niazi, Feizollah; Moosavizadeh, Seyed Mehdi; Motaghedi, Babak; Tizmaghz, Adnan

doi:10.7860/jcdr/2017/19235.9297

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The study by Reilly and Davison utilized 49 patients but did not discuss how many patients underwent open or closed rhinoplasty. 18 All studies reported performing a preoperative evaluation of patients. While a majority of studies did not report complications, studies that reported complications included nasal tip numbness, columellar scar, slipped dorsal implant, and infection.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Motamed et al evaluated outcomes of a new suture technique in rhinoplasty which utilized a cephalic dome septal rotation structure for improved tip definition. 18 Results indicated that the new suture technique maintains the ideal position of the nasal tip projection and definition. The new suture technique also leads to tip definition with slight dorsal tip inclination.…”

Section: Retrospective Cohortmentioning

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Outcomes of Closed versus Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open and closed rhinoplasty are two main approaches to perform nasal modifications. According to current literature, there is no current consensus among plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists on which technique is preferred in terms of aesthetic result, complications, and patient satisfaction. This study uses published research to determine whether open or closed rhinoplasty leads to superior patient outcomes. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for systematic reviews were followed and a literature search was conducted in four databases based on our search strategy. Articles were then imported into COVIDENCE where they underwent primary screening and full-text review. Twenty articles were selected in this study after 243 articles were screened. There were 4 case series, 12 retrospective cohort studies, 1 prospective cohort study, 1 case–control, and 2 outcomes research. There were three cosmetic studies, eight functional studies, and nine studies that included both cosmetic and functional components. Sixteen studies utilized both open and closed rhinoplasty and four utilized open rhinoplasty. Both techniques demonstrated high patient and provider satisfaction and no advantage was found between techniques. Based on available studies, we cannot conclude if there is a preference between open or closed rhinoplasty in terms of which technique leads to better patient outcomes. Several studies determined that open rhinoplasty and closed rhinoplasty leads to comparative patient satisfaction. To make outcome reporting more reliable and uniform among studies, authors should look to utilize the Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty Effectiveness scale and the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Retrospective Cohortmentioning

confidence: 93%

Outcomes of Closed versus Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We performed the present systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyze (PRISMA) statement. Two reviewers began to deeply search the various databases of article published including Medline, Web of knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library for all eligible studies in accordance with the considered keywords including: "thyroid", "hyperthyroidism", "quality of life", "Graves´ disease", and "surgery" based on the Mesh vocabulary [21][22][23]. Disagreements were resolved through discussion and decided by a third reviewer.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Different observational studies and randomized trials attempted to show advantages as well as limitations of surgical approaches for improvement in patients' quality of life (QOL) suffering hyperthyroidism caused by the Graves´ disease (GD). We aimed to systematically examine the impact of surgery (thyroidectomy) on different components of QOL in patients with GD. Two reviewers began to deeply search the various databases of article published including Medline, Web of knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library for all eligible studies in accordance with the considered keywords. In final, seven articles were eligible for the final analysis that published between 2012 and 2019. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software was employed for analysis. Assessing the level of quality of life using SF-36 tool showed significantly increase in both physical component score (weighted mean differences of 0.428, p <0.001) and psychological component score (weighted mean differences of 0.277, p <0.001) postoperatively compared with the baseline values. The assessment of QOL using the Thy PRO questionnaire also showed significantly improvement in total QOL score after surgery compared with before that (weighted mean differences of -1.466, p <0.001). We revealed considerably improving both physical and mental aspects of QOL following surgery in Graves' disease.

show abstract

Introducing a Favourite Tip Definition and Projection with Tripod Suture in Rhinoplasty

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

Outcomes of Closed versus Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

Outcomes of Closed versus Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

Untitled

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About