2017
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blastic transformation of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia caused by the copy number gain of oncogenic KRAS

Abstract: Previous studies have reported several cases of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) developing blastic transformation during an indolent clinical course, but the underlying mechanism of transformation is still not well understood. In this report, we describe a case of JMML with blastic transformation possibly caused by additional copy number gains of the KRAS mutant allele. We have discovered that the copy number gain of the mutant allele is an additional possible cause of blastic transformation in JMML.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5,14 In line with previous case reports, duplication of oncogenic NRAS or KRAS from acquired uniparental disomy is associated with aggressive transformation of JMML. 39 Components of the polycomb repressive complex 2 network like EZH2 and ASXL1, or other epigenetic modifiers like DNMT3A, are mutated in about 15% of JMML patients. 4,5,40 EZH2 (7q31.2) point mutations are associated with monosomy 7, where they become hemizygous by loss of the wild-type allele.…”
Section: Cbl-mutated Jmmlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,14 In line with previous case reports, duplication of oncogenic NRAS or KRAS from acquired uniparental disomy is associated with aggressive transformation of JMML. 39 Components of the polycomb repressive complex 2 network like EZH2 and ASXL1, or other epigenetic modifiers like DNMT3A, are mutated in about 15% of JMML patients. 4,5,40 EZH2 (7q31.2) point mutations are associated with monosomy 7, where they become hemizygous by loss of the wild-type allele.…”
Section: Cbl-mutated Jmmlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patient 1, a clone with combined PTPN11 and SETBP1 mutations was discovered, whereas a clone with a homozygous mutation in the KRAS gene was found in patient 2. Although additional alterations in the KRAS gene in JMML patients have been described as a driver of sAML transformation 20 , the percentage of identified cells with KRAS LOH in patient 2 was significantly lower than the percentage of blast cells at the time of scDNA-seq. Potential causes of sAML transformation could be the presence of mutations in genes not included in the Single-cell DNA Myeloid Kit used in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The finding of an aberrant B‐lymphoblast population was another unique feature for our patient. The blast phase of JMML is typically myeloid, similar to chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), though B‐ and T‐cell transformations have been reported . In CML, a minority of patients will have a small abnormal B‐lymphoblast population that does not necessarily signify impending progression to a B‐lymphoblastic phase .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%