2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A constrained extended Kalman filter for the optimal estimate of kinematics and kinetics of a sagittal symmetric exercise

Abstract: This paper presents a method for real-time estimation of the kinematics and kinetics of a human body performing a sagittal symmetric motor task, which would minimize the impact of the stereophotogrammetric soft tissue artefacts (STA). The method is based on a bi-dimensional mechanical model of the locomotor apparatus the state variables of which (joint angles, velocities and accelerations, and the segments lengths and inertial parameters) are estimated by a constrained extended Kalman filter (CEKF) that fuses … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicates that the optimisation of the marker local coordinates resulted in a similar effect on the joint angles computation for both methods, whereas MB l:a:m: led to different results. Low kinematic errors of MB a:m à : and EB a:m à : does not necessarily mean that joint angles were accurate or that STA were fully compensated (Bonnet et al 2017). Kinematic accuracy can only really be assessed with intra-cortical pins (Andersen et al 2010a) or biplanar fluoroscopic data (Gasparutto et al 2015;Richard et al 2017).…”
Section: Joint Anglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It indicates that the optimisation of the marker local coordinates resulted in a similar effect on the joint angles computation for both methods, whereas MB l:a:m: led to different results. Low kinematic errors of MB a:m à : and EB a:m à : does not necessarily mean that joint angles were accurate or that STA were fully compensated (Bonnet et al 2017). Kinematic accuracy can only really be assessed with intra-cortical pins (Andersen et al 2010a) or biplanar fluoroscopic data (Gasparutto et al 2015;Richard et al 2017).…”
Section: Joint Anglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the proposed algorithm estimate kinematics of multi-rigid-body model using the joint constraints for the whole body, the proposed algorithm can be considered as a kind of the “global optimization”(Leardini et al, 2005 ) including multi-body kinematics optimization (Duprey et al, 2010 ; Richard et al, 2017 ) and kinematics estimation based on Kalman filter (Cerveri et al, 2003 , 2005 ; Bonnet et al, 2017a ). Here, let us clarify the novel aspect of the proposed algorithm complementary to the existing global optimization methods.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a better insight, the analysis of the relative movement between the skin and the bone should be completed by the analysis of the ground reaction forces (not known in the present study). The recent studies which simultaneously track skin markers trajectories and external forces to estimate joint kinematics and segment masses (Bonnet et al, 2017;Jackson et al, 2015) may be adapted to thoroughly identify the parameters of the wobbling mass models. Additionally, the deformable modelling of the lower limb segments (Clark and Hawkins, 2010;Halloran et al, 2010;Stelletta et al, 2017) may help in understanding the dynamics effects of the soft tissue deformation (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%