2019
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2019.1705798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and kinematics consistency of marker-based scaling approaches on a lower limb model: a comparative study with imagery data

Abstract: Medical images are not typically included in protocol of motion laboratories. Thus, accurate scaling of musculoskeletal models from optoelectronic data are important for any biomechanical analysis. The aim of the current study was to identify a scaling method based on optoelectronic data, inspired from literature, which could offer the best trade-off between accurate geometrical parameters (segment lengths, orientation of joint axes, marker coordinates) and consistent inverse kinematics outputs (kinematic erro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is interesting for markerless motion capture systems, especially for inertial measurement units [9] which mainly rely on anthropometrics for the scaling of kinematic chains. Also, the measurements provided by the SVM could be used as a new way to geometrically scale a musculoskeletal model through optimization techniques [10], [11], diminishing the number of actual measures to be done to scale the complete model. The method could also be applied to the prediction of non-palpated landmarks such as hip joint centers [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is interesting for markerless motion capture systems, especially for inertial measurement units [9] which mainly rely on anthropometrics for the scaling of kinematic chains. Also, the measurements provided by the SVM could be used as a new way to geometrically scale a musculoskeletal model through optimization techniques [10], [11], diminishing the number of actual measures to be done to scale the complete model. The method could also be applied to the prediction of non-palpated landmarks such as hip joint centers [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both open loop and closed loop models were adjusted with geometrical parameters were taken from Dumas et al (2007); Pennestrì et al (2007); Seth et al (2016) and then scaled to subjects' size and mass using the CusToM scaling routine Muller et al (2019); Puchaud et al (2020) based on motion capture data.…”
Section: Closed Loop Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…segment lengths and anatomical landmarks were 'isometrically scaled' ensuring a good initial guess. Then, an optimisation scheme was applied to scale the model with the anthropometric measurements d (Puchaud et al 2019), it yielded to the following minimisation problem, optimising segment homothetic coefficients using interior-point method:…”
Section: Biomechanical Model Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%