2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2016.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long telomere length predicts poor clinical outcome in esophageal cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, telomerase-high CSCs are among the most energetically activated, migratory and proliferative cell sub-populations. These observations may provide a mechanistic explanation for why long telomere length [ 6 – 9 ] (a surrogate marker of increased telomerase activity) is specifically associated with metastasis and poor clinical outcome in NSC lung cancer and many other tumor types. Thus, high telomerase activity may drive poor clinical outcome by activating mitochondrial biogenesis, “fueling” the proliferation in lung CSCs [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, telomerase-high CSCs are among the most energetically activated, migratory and proliferative cell sub-populations. These observations may provide a mechanistic explanation for why long telomere length [ 6 – 9 ] (a surrogate marker of increased telomerase activity) is specifically associated with metastasis and poor clinical outcome in NSC lung cancer and many other tumor types. Thus, high telomerase activity may drive poor clinical outcome by activating mitochondrial biogenesis, “fueling” the proliferation in lung CSCs [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above examples are consistent with the idea of telomere length loss and subsequent dysfunction as being a precursor to tumour progression. Other studies indicate that the converse may be true, where for some cancers, longer telomere length predicts poor clinical outcome [ 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 ]. This has been demonstrated in oesophageal cancer where patients with a relative telomere length (RTL) greater than 1.22, as measured qPCR, have a shorter median survival time than patients with an RTL under this threshold [ 131 ].…”
Section: Telomere Length As a Prognostic Marker In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings on leukocyte telomere length however, do not necessarily conflict with the model of short dysfunctional telomeres in the developing tumour clone, driving tumour progression through the generation of large scale genomic instability and subsequent clonal evolution. Instead an “immunohypothesis” has been put forward, suggesting that longer leukocyte telomere length may arise in patients with a suppressed immune system, leading to fewer cell divisions and reduced telomere shortening [ 131 ]. In support of this hypothesis, a significant correlation between leukocyte telomere length and peripheral levels of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs) has been found in kidney cancer patients and hepatocellular carcinoma [ 136 , 138 ].…”
Section: Telomere Length As a Prognostic Marker In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might thus assume that short telomeres would always be detrimental. However in the case of esophageal cancer [140], prostate cancer [141], clear renal cell carcinoma [142], melanoma [143] and hepatocellular carcinoma [144], longer telomeres are associated with a poorer prognosis, possibly related to difficulties in replicating long telomeric tracts. As Rivera and colleagues showed, long telomeres might also be detrimental to cell fitness [145].…”
Section: Tert Expression and Telomere Length: Clinical Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%