2016
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between Plagiotremus spp., Labroides dimidiatus and their clients: evidence for behavioural niche partitioning

Abstract: This study employed community analysis and behavioural field observations to explore the inter-specific interactions between fangblenny species (Plagiotremus spp.), the cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus and their target species and found that the presence of Plagiotremus spp. did not affect the total amount that L. dimidiatus cleaned but it did reduce the amount L. dimidiatus cleaned key prey species of the Plagiotremus spp. The behavioural interactions between adult L. dimidiatus and their clients changed i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each camera recorded 24 fps at a wide angle setting and at a resolution of 1080 dpi. After the 20-min filming period, two snorkelers located 5 m to either side of the focal colony independently but simultaneously performed a fish census, including species identification and counts for 2 min, considering all fish within a 2-m radius of the focal colony (following methods outlined in Hansen, O'Leary & Ward, 2017). Where records differed, the average of the two estimates was taken, or the greater estimate where accounts differed by only one individual or species was taken.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each camera recorded 24 fps at a wide angle setting and at a resolution of 1080 dpi. After the 20-min filming period, two snorkelers located 5 m to either side of the focal colony independently but simultaneously performed a fish census, including species identification and counts for 2 min, considering all fish within a 2-m radius of the focal colony (following methods outlined in Hansen, O'Leary & Ward, 2017). Where records differed, the average of the two estimates was taken, or the greater estimate where accounts differed by only one individual or species was taken.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%