2016
DOI: 10.1890/15-1434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence, light‐use efficiency, and process‐based GPP models in maize

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
64
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SIF is a by-product of the photosynthetic process, thus is mechanistically coupled to vegetation functioning in contrast to optical reflectance-based vegetation indices (VIs), such as the normalized difference vegetation index, which is often used to model or predict productivity [9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. SIF data from satellite platforms have been demonstrated to be related to plant photosynthetic functioning, have been shown to scale linearly with modelled and flux tower GPP, have empirical links with crop and deciduous forest GPP in temperate zones, and captured differences in relative productivity of different vegetative classes in temperate regions [11,12,14,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SIF is a by-product of the photosynthetic process, thus is mechanistically coupled to vegetation functioning in contrast to optical reflectance-based vegetation indices (VIs), such as the normalized difference vegetation index, which is often used to model or predict productivity [9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. SIF data from satellite platforms have been demonstrated to be related to plant photosynthetic functioning, have been shown to scale linearly with modelled and flux tower GPP, have empirical links with crop and deciduous forest GPP in temperate zones, and captured differences in relative productivity of different vegetative classes in temperate regions [11,12,14,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies also suggest SIF is an earlier indicator of vegetation stress than other remote sensing vegetative health indices [20,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Global scale studies utilizing satellite-based SIF measurements and vegetation classes based on the International Geosphere Biosphere Programme (IGBP) classifications have shown significant vegetation class-specific SIF~GPP relationships, except for tropical evergreen broadleaf forest (EBF) [12,15,28,29,[38][39][40][41][42]. Li, Xiao [41], in particular, examined the vegetation class-specific SIF for eight vegetation classes for the entire globe (deciduous broadleaf forest (DBF), EBF, grasslands (GRA), savanna (SAV), evergreen needleleaf forest (ENF), open shrubland (OSH), crop (CRO) and mixed forests (MF)) and found significant differences in SIF among some classes at global scale as well as SIF~GPP relationships for all but EBF [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data obtained from these two sites have been used to study CO 2 exchanges, crop phenology, and gross primary production and respiration (e.g. Verma et al 2005, Suyker et al 2005, Wagle et al 2016. However, no systematic evaluation of irrigation impacts on hydro-meteorological variables has been conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guanter et al, 2014]. SIF captures the seasonal variation of GPP and can be used as a reliable proxy for validating the trend of GPP [Lee et al, 2013;Wagle et al, 2016]. The objective of this HE ET AL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%