2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016jg003603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of SMAP soil moisture for global simulation of gross primary production

Abstract: In this study, high‐quality soil moisture data derived from the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellite measurements are evaluated from a perspective of improving the estimation of the global gross primary production (GPP) using a process‐based ecosystem model, namely, the Boreal Ecosystem Productivity Simulator (BEPS). The SMAP soil moisture data are assimilated into BEPS using an ensemble Kalman filter. The correlation coefficient (r) between simulated GPP from the sunlit leaves and Sun‐induced chlorop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trend is then further extrapolated back to 2000, and forward to 2015. The trend of MERIS chlorophyll information was then used as a proxy of the trend of the maximum rate of carboxylation at 25°C ( V cmax, 25 ) in an ecosystem model named the Boreal Ecosystems Productivity Simulator (BEPS) (Chen et al, , , ; He et al, , ; Ju et al, ; Liu et al, ). The MERIS MTCI is derived based on Level 2 data which have been atmospherically corrected (Dash et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend is then further extrapolated back to 2000, and forward to 2015. The trend of MERIS chlorophyll information was then used as a proxy of the trend of the maximum rate of carboxylation at 25°C ( V cmax, 25 ) in an ecosystem model named the Boreal Ecosystems Productivity Simulator (BEPS) (Chen et al, , , ; He et al, , ; Ju et al, ; Liu et al, ). The MERIS MTCI is derived based on Level 2 data which have been atmospherically corrected (Dash et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, DA-NN exhibits drier conditions in the predominantly agricultural areas of the Midwest and parts of the Northwest (eastern Montana, eastern Oregon and the Dakotas). In these regions, SMAP observes the effects of agricultural practices (e.g., tile drainage or tillage) that are not represented in the model (see e.g., He et al [48]). For the agricultural areas subject to irrigation, these somewhat counter-intuitive results reflect the dry bias of the SMAP retrievals relative to the model (see e.g., Figure 4d in Kolassa et al [25]) .…”
Section: Mean Soil Moisture Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these factors have explained a total of 56% of the variation of NPP (Figure 8), other climate-related factors, such as sunshine duration, soil temperature, precipitation characteristics (e.g., effective precipitation, precipitation intensity), CO 2 concentrations, N enrichment and deposition (e.g., policy and planning changes), should be considered in future studies [67]. Moreover, other phonological metrics (e.g., Start of Season, End of Season), species competition, and disturbances such as anthropogenic activities (irrigation, fertilization [68,69], harvest, land use/land cover change), wildfires, plant diseases, pests, floods, and droughts as well as the time-lag effect of the above-mentioned variables can vary by region [50], and should also be considered in future studies.…”
Section: Shortcomings and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%