The influence of a specific ophthalmological electronic health record on ICD-10 coding

Abstract

BackgroundA specific Electronic Health Record (EHR) for ophthalmology was introduced in an academic center in Germany. As diagnoses coding corresponding to the International Classification of Diseases Version 10 (ICD-10) is mandatory for billing reasons in Germany, we analyzed whether a change occurred in the diversity and number of diagnoses after the EHR introduction. The number of patients was also analyzed. Proper diagnoses coding is of the utmost importance for further data analysis or billing.MethodsGraphical User Interfaces (GUIs) were created by using Advanced Business Application Programming language in EHR “i.s.h.med.” Development of an EHR was conducted in close collaboration between physicians and software engineers. ICD-10 coding was implemented by using a “hit list” and a search engine for diagnoses. An observational analysis of a 6-month period prior to and after the introduction of an ophthalmological specific EHR was conducted by investigating the diversity and number of diagnoses in various ophthalmological disease categories and the number of patient consultations.ResultsDuring the introduction of a specific ophthalmological EHR, we observed a significant increase in the emergency department cases (323.9 vs. 359.9 cases per week), possibly related to documentation requirements. The number of scheduled outpatients didn’t change significantly (355.12 vs. 360.24 cases per week). The variety of diagnoses also changed: on average, 156.2 different diagnoses were made per week throughout our hospital before the EHR launch, compared to 186.8 different diagnoses per week thereafter (p < 0.05). Additionally, a significantly higher number of diagnoses per case and per week were observed in both emergency and subspecialty outpatient clinics (1.15 vs. 1.22 and 1.10 vs. 1.47, respectively).ConclusionsAn optimized EHR was created for ophthalmological needs and for simplified ICD-10 coding. The implementation of digital patient recording increased the diversity of the diagnoses used per case as well as the number of diagnoses coded per case. A general limitation to date is the suboptimal precision of ICD-10 coding in ophthalmology. Correct coding is of utmost importance for future data analysis.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0340-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

<p>Near Vision Spectacle Coverage and Associated Factors Among Adults Living in Finote Selam Town, Northwest Ethiopia: Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study</p>

“…1,3,14 Presenting near visual impairment (PNVI) was defined based on the updated International Classification of Diseases ICD 11 as presenting near visual acuity worse than 6/12. 3,22 NVI was graded as "mild" when PNVA was less than 6/12 to 6/18 (worse than N8 to N10), "moderate" when PNVA was less than 6/18 to 6/60 (worse than N10 to N18), and "severe" when PNVA was less than 6/60 (worse than N18). 5,15 Functional presbyopia was defined as binocular near vision less than N8 (20/50) at 40 cm with presenting distance refractive correction, to achieve a near visual acuity (VA) criterion (≥1 line of acuity improvement N8 print or (20/50)).…”

A proposed minimum data set for international primary care optometry: a modified Delphi study

“…In the case of a disease sub‐classification (e.g. Wet v Dry AMD) not being present in ICD‐10 the free text could supplement it.…”

Eye disorders in patients with celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease: A study using clinical data warehouse

“…This ophthalmological center serves on average 65,000 outpatients and 12,000 hospitalized patients per year. 10 All data warehouse queries were approved by the local data protection officer. Written informed consent for the retrospective use of anonymized data was provided by all patients included in this study.…”