The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3212-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of urinary cotinine in non-smoking residents in smoke-free homes in the Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS)

Abstract: BackgroundThe objectives of this study were to determine urinary cotinine concentrations in non-smoking residents of smoke-free homes and to establish the relationship of urinary cotinine with housing type and other socio-demographic and secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure factors.MethodsWe used data from the Korean National Environmental Health Survey I (2009–2011). The study included 814 non-smoking adult residents living in apartments, attached, and detached housing. Residents who lived with smokers were exclud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be related to occasional smoking or increased social interactions with smokers among former smokers. Increased exposure to ETS in former smokers has been reported previously in studies on ETS exposure in Swiss and Korean adults [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This may be related to occasional smoking or increased social interactions with smokers among former smokers. Increased exposure to ETS in former smokers has been reported previously in studies on ETS exposure in Swiss and Korean adults [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Data were collected by questionnaires and blood and urine samples. The details of the KNEHS I were described in previous studies [ 20 , 21 ]. To exclude the effects of FHS and SHS, we restricted our respondents based on the responses to the questionnaires as follows: those who (1) never smoked or were former smokers ( n = 3815) and (2) reported no SHS exposure ( n = 2411).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who answered railroads and others had fewer personnel and were excluded from the study. Also, 760 males, 367 subjects whose urinary creatinine concentration exceeded the appropriate range (0.3–3.0 g/L), and 16 subjects for whom urinary cotinine concentration data were missing and 184 subjects whose urine cotinine level was less than the method detection limit, 42 subjects who is considered as a smoker(urine cotinine > 100 μg/L), 34 outliers(< 25th percentile - 1.5*interquartile range or > 75th percentile + 1.5* interquartile range) are excluded [ 23 – 25 ]. The final dataset included 1322 female subjects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%