Bibliometric analysis of scientific literature on intestinal parasites in Argentina during the period 1985–2014

Basualdo, Juan Ángel; Grenóvero, María S.; Bertucci, Evangelina; Molina, Nora Beatriz

doi:10.1016/j.ram.2016.03.005

Cited by 13 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on this latter classification, economic literature that investigates competitiveness on a country, region, sector, industry, or company level proposes many different measurements to evaluate it, whether through commercial or performance indicators. Alvarez and Duran Lima [27] Analysis of scientific publications is an essential component in the research process, being a useful tool for analyzing the process of generation and evolution of knowledge, evaluating scientific quality and the impact on the academic world [28]. Bibliometric analysis examines scientific material in an objective, quantitative way, being useful for organizing information in a specific thematic field [29].…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the foregoing, many researchers such as Jambor et al [33], Bojnec and Ferto [34], Stojcic et al [35], etc., use the additional expression "export competitiveness" to refer to competitiveness in the international context. Analysis of scientific publications is an essential component in the research process, being a useful tool for analyzing the process of generation and evolution of knowledge, evaluating scientific quality and the impact on the academic world [28]. Bibliometric analysis examines scientific material in an objective, quantitative way, being useful for organizing information in a specific thematic field [29].…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Bibliometric Analysis of International Competitiveness (1983–2017)

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this paper is to determine the current state of scientific production regarding “competitiveness” in the international context through a bibliometric analysis. This study presents a review of 2,293 documents published about competitiveness in the international context from the Scopus database (1983–2017). Two different processing software applications were used, Vosviewer and Scimat. Although very recent bibliometric analyses of the topic exist, the methodology applied in the search term is restricted due to the separate use of a single search combination “national competitiveness” or “international competitiveness”. For this work, three combinations of words with logical operators were used, TITLE-ABS-KEY (“international competitiveness”) OR (“national competitiveness”) OR (“export competitiveness”), thus managing to span the concept of competitiveness in the international context in a broader sense. Our results show that competitive research is in a period of high production. The most productive authors and journals are not the most cited on competitiveness. Only three countries stand out with the largest scientific production about this topic. The trend of the most recent research points to knowledge areas in environmental sciences. The most researched geographical areas in international competitiveness encompass the whole world and especially Southeast Asia.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Bibliometric Analysis of International Competitiveness (1983–2017)

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since scientific papers are the primary means of communicating and preserving scientific advances, the study of scholarly scientific production is a good proxy for knowledge generation and research progress (Basualdo et al, 2016). We conducted a bibliometric study to describe the contribution of the Mexican academic community to scientific literature regarding viticulture and oenology, and to compare its evolution with that of other Latin American countries.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contribution of Mexican scholars to viticultural and oenological research: where do we stand?

Guillermo¹,

Castro-López²,

Méndez³

2018

OENO One

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wine consumption in Mexico has increased continuously over the last decade. However, domestic wine production is not sufficient to satisfy domestic demand, and foreign wine producers have been the main beneficiaries of the growth of the Mexican market. This highlights the need of Mexican winemakers for scientific evidence and technological innovations that can help to make better management choices both in the field and in the winery. This paper presents the results of a bibliometric study that aimed to investigate the contribution of the Mexican academic community to scientific literature in viticulture and oenology . Results indicate that Mexican academia has failed to keep pace with the constant growth of the wine industry in Mexico. The growth of scholarly scientific output in Mexico has been slower than that of other Latin American countries. In addition, Mexican scientific output relied to a large extent (36 %) on collaborations with research groups from developed countries, while collaborative papers with Latin American countries were comparatively rare (7.9 %). Domestic collaboration among Mexican institutions is still limited, as indicated by the low number of such publications (23.2 %) and by the considerable number of institutions producing papers independently (49 %). Agrosciences, biological sciences, chemistry, microbiology and health sciences were the main areas of research of Mexican academics.

show abstract

“…Dentro de los pocos trabajos sobre la producción científica argentina que se han publicado en los últimos cinco años, sólo los trabajos de Molina et al (2015) y Basualdo et al (2016), en el área de ciencias de la salud, Miguel et al (2015) a nivel global, Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Miguel & de Moya-Anegón (2015) en ciencias sociales y humanas, y el de Pereira, Higer & Carmaran (2018) en biodiversidad, incorporan análisis sobre colaboración internacional. Si se hace foco específicamente en temas relacionados con Agroindustria, que es el tema de interés aquí, Merlino-Santesteban (2013) muestra que la producción argentina registrada en Scopus en el periodo 2001-2010 en Agricultura se encuentra en la quinta posición a nivel mundial y segunda en América Latina y Caribe -ALyC, mientras que Veterinaria, ocupa la posición 24 en el mundo y 17 en ALyC.…”

Section: Marco Teóricounclassified

La investigación argentina sobre agroindustria y su colaboración internacional (2007-2016)

González

Chinchilla‐Rodríguez

2020

Palabra clave

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este trabajo tiene como objetivo comparar los patrones de colaboración de la producción científica argentina de agroindustria de acuerdo con el alcance geográfico de la investigación, es decir, temas dirigidos a lectores nacionales y temas que van más allá de la frontera nacional recogida en la base de datos Scopus para el periodo 2007-2016. El comportamiento de ambos grupos se analiza y describe de la siguiente manera: a) se discrimina según se trate de temas de investigación globales o locales, aplicando el criterio de ausencia o presencia de topónimos nacionales, respectivamente; b) se presenta el volumen de coautoría con diferentes países agrupados por continentes ; c) se determinan las 20 palabras claves más frecuentes para cada caso y, d) se pone en relación con el Índice-H de los países, utilizado en este caso como indicador de impacto científico del país colaborador. Los principales resultados muestran que solo con Europa se logra la proporción de colaboración a los niveles de la ciencia del país (40%). Con países de continentes como Oceanía, Asia y África, la colaboración es muy minoritaria (5% o menos). La distribución en temas globales y locales se mantiene en todos los continentes con leves incrementos en Europa, América del Norte y Caribe y Oceanía a favor de los temas locales. La correlación entre la colaboración internacional y el impacto científico que tienen los países con los que se colabora es relativamente positiva. Los temas sobre los que se investiga se anclan principalmente en la Patagonia, el litoral marítimo y se centran especialmente en los bovinos y el maíz. El estudio aporta información útil para pensar la conformación de equipos de investigación, la planificación de programas de movilidad internacional y alianzas estratégicas en relación con la colaboración futura, y lo hace en un área estratégica que genera fuertes expectativas para el desarrollo económico del país.

show abstract

Bibliometric analysis of scientific literature on intestinal parasites in Argentina during the period 1985–2014

Cited by 13 publications

References 34 publications

A Bibliometric Analysis of International Competitiveness (1983–2017)

A Bibliometric Analysis of International Competitiveness (1983–2017)

Contribution of Mexican scholars to viticultural and oenological research: where do we stand?

La investigación argentina sobre agroindustria y su colaboración internacional (2007-2016)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About