2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of the NuvaRing® Applicator in healthy females: a multicenter, open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, correct placement occurred in all participants using both techniques 10 . Although adverse events were uncommon, more events occurred through use of the applicator than via finger insertion 10 . Given the pliant nature of the NuvaRing and the recommended technique for insertion, we suggest that education by the General Practitioners prior to commencing use, may assist patients in optimising placement of the device.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, correct placement occurred in all participants using both techniques 10 . Although adverse events were uncommon, more events occurred through use of the applicator than via finger insertion 10 . Given the pliant nature of the NuvaRing and the recommended technique for insertion, we suggest that education by the General Practitioners prior to commencing use, may assist patients in optimising placement of the device.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although the NuvaRing has been developed to be placed by a patient's own fingers, applicators also exist. A randomised cross‐over trial in 2016, compared the efficacy of finger insertion versus the use of an applicator 10 . Interestingly, correct placement occurred in all participants using both techniques 10 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation