Put a Ring in It: Exploring Women's Experiences with the Contraceptive Vaginal Ring in Ontario

LaRoche, Kathryn J.; Groß, Eva; Sheehy, Grace; Foster, Angel M.

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2018.04.009

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Members of the medical community have acknowledged the risk of adverse effects, but have sought to balance the narrative by noting the elevated risk of DVT associated with other contraceptive methods (e.g., the pill and contraceptive patch), and the even greater risk of DVT associated with pregnancy . Although DVT risk was not a theme identified in the studies included in our review (perhaps because much of the data was collected prior to the aforementioned media coverage), a study of Canadian ring users who were interviewed in 2015 found that negative media reports were cited as a reason for contraceptive ring discontinuation . Women's awareness and perceptions of these reports may be worth exploring in future work.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Qualitative Systematic Review of Women's Experiences Using Contraceptive Vaginal Rings: Implications for New Technologies

Vargas

Midoun

Guillen

et al. 2019

Perspect Sexual Reproductive

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CONTEXT Vaginal rings are available for contraception and hormone replacement, and are being developed as HIV/STD or multipurpose prevention technologies. A comprehensive understanding of women's expectations of and experiences with rings is urgently needed to inform product development and to optimize ring use. METHODS Three databases (PubMed, Global Health and CINAHL) were searched for English‐language, peer‐reviewed articles published between January 1996 and November 2017 that reported qualitative data on barriers to and facilitators of use of female‐controlled contraceptive methods. Data on study methods, findings and conclusions pertaining to contraceptive rings were extracted, organized and analyzed. RESULTS Twenty‐six articles, all published since 2008, met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies focused largely or entirely on rings (and involved current, former or potential users), while the others focused on other contraceptive methods but included ring‐specific data. Familiarity with the ring was low, and women commonly had initial concerns about the method—often related to insertion and removal, cleanliness and discomfort with touching their vagina—that were typically overcome over time. Other major themes were issues related to ring use and discontinuation, the importance of ring‐related properties and characteristics, and considerations related to sexual partners and health care providers. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative data have the potential to inform ring design and promotion. Future research should further explore women's expectations and experiences with the ring, the value of involving male partners in ring evaluation, and evaluation of interventions to improve patient–provider communication concerning ring choice and use.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%