2016
DOI: 10.1080/08959420.2016.1187058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Budget Proposal for China’s Public Long-Term Care Policy

Abstract: Long-term care (LTC) policy is at an experimental stage in China, characterized by various regional pilot programs. The public cost of LTC is difficult to estimate due to a lack of clarity about policy detail from the central government. This article analyzes the current disabled status for vulnerable older people without sufficient financial resources and family supports. It focuses on estimating a safety net public subsidy policy for LTC services in China, both for today and into the future, using China Heal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, scholars rarely perform empirical studies on LTC financing; the majority has provided policy suggestions to improve the LTCI system in China [18]. Empirical studies of LTC demand fall into two main categories: measuring LTC cost using macro-data such as disability rates [19][20][21][22][23] and discussing LTC service trends using micro-data from field investigations in various cities, based on such surveys as CLHLS (Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, Peking University), SSAPUR (Survey of the Aged Population in Urban/Rural China, China Research Center on Aging, CRCA), and CHRLS (China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, CHARLS, Peking University) [24][25][26][27][28]. Among them, Activities of Daily Life (ADL) was a very important and basic indicator for measuring disability levels, which is not an official classification.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, scholars rarely perform empirical studies on LTC financing; the majority has provided policy suggestions to improve the LTCI system in China [18]. Empirical studies of LTC demand fall into two main categories: measuring LTC cost using macro-data such as disability rates [19][20][21][22][23] and discussing LTC service trends using micro-data from field investigations in various cities, based on such surveys as CLHLS (Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, Peking University), SSAPUR (Survey of the Aged Population in Urban/Rural China, China Research Center on Aging, CRCA), and CHRLS (China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, CHARLS, Peking University) [24][25][26][27][28]. Among them, Activities of Daily Life (ADL) was a very important and basic indicator for measuring disability levels, which is not an official classification.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first day of their implementation, the performance of these LTCI pilots has received increasing attention from researchers and policy makers. Several studies addressed cost issues, including financial efficiency and expenditure projections . However, besides a balanced budget, meeting individuals' needs and improving access to LTC services are also key features of a successful LTCI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, with the trend of longevity, many hospitals in China have already established geriatric department, but the long term care or short term care or home care are insufficient in our country and specialized care cannot be extensively provided for elderly patients [14,15]. Therefore they or their relatives have a phobia of being discharged from hospital to home directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%