2016
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial T1 mapping for patients with implanted cardiac devices using wideband inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo readout

Abstract: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using Wideband-FLASH-MOLLI to mitigate image artifacts and to produce accurate myocardial T1 maps in patients with ICDs. Magn Reson Med 77:1495-1504, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the FLASH imaging readouts as used in the proposed MB acquisition substantially compromise the accuracy in commonly used inversion recovery T 1 mapping sequences. Although tailored reconstruction schemes have been proposed to mitigate this effect , MB inversion recovery T 1 mapping is beyond the scope of this study, but this method warrants further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the FLASH imaging readouts as used in the proposed MB acquisition substantially compromise the accuracy in commonly used inversion recovery T 1 mapping sequences. Although tailored reconstruction schemes have been proposed to mitigate this effect , MB inversion recovery T 1 mapping is beyond the scope of this study, but this method warrants further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Another sequence employing a wideband inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo readout has also been described …”
Section: New Applications Of T1 Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar reduction of inversion factor in vivo has been found in previous studies (19,20). The greatly reduced inversion factor in vivo was not due to the body size of the volunteer, as the in vivo inversion factor had a very narrow range of 0.87-0.89 despite the wide range of body weight of the subjects (50-102 kg).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%