2016
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkw058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective evaluation of the OXA-48K-SeT assay, an immunochromatographic test for the rapid detection of OXA-48-type carbapenemases

Abstract: The OXA-48 K-SeT assay was efficient, rapid and easy to implement in the routine workflow of a clinical microbiology laboratory for the confirmation of OXA-48-like carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. It could complete the existing panel of tests available for the confirmation of OXA-48-like carbapenemases, especially in countries with high OXA-48 prevalence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The OXA-163/48 Duo K-SeT test differentiates between subfamilies with distinct substrate profiles, such as OXA-48 and OXA-163, obviating the need for more costly and lengthy characterization with molecular amplification methods. The assay was highly sensitive and specific and detected the presence of OXA-48-producing strains within seconds to minutes, similar to results previously reported for the OXA-48 subfamily and KPC carbapenemases (7)(8)(9)(10)25). No significant difference in band intensities was observed between the different subfamilies and/or variants tested or between the bacterial species, in carbapenem MICs, or in associations of the OXA protein to other ␤-lactamases (data not shown).…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The OXA-163/48 Duo K-SeT test differentiates between subfamilies with distinct substrate profiles, such as OXA-48 and OXA-163, obviating the need for more costly and lengthy characterization with molecular amplification methods. The assay was highly sensitive and specific and detected the presence of OXA-48-producing strains within seconds to minutes, similar to results previously reported for the OXA-48 subfamily and KPC carbapenemases (7)(8)(9)(10)25). No significant difference in band intensities was observed between the different subfamilies and/or variants tested or between the bacterial species, in carbapenem MICs, or in associations of the OXA protein to other ␤-lactamases (data not shown).…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The OXA-48 K-SeT test (Coris BioConcept, Belgium) relies on immunological capture of two epitopes specific to the OXA-48 variants OXA-48, OXA-181, OXA-204, OXA-232, and OXA-244 using colloidal gold nanoparticles bound to a nitrocellulose membrane within a lateral flow device (6). The reported sensitivity and specificity were both 100%, with the result obtained in less than 10 min (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Noteworthy is that new allelic variants of OXA-48 have emerged, namely, OXA-163 and the related variants OXA-247, OXA-405, and OXA-438 (11)(12)(13)(14), which are not recognized by the OXA-48 K-SeT test (6,8,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simple protocol and required materials makes it promising for widespread adoption by clinical microbiology labs [van der Zwaluw 2015]. An immunochromatographic assay had perfect sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%) at detecting OXA-48-like CPE compared to isolates possessing OXA-48-like variants lacking carbapenemase activity or Class A and B carbapenemases [Dortet 2016]. Accurate detection methods are important for developing ideal patient treatment options and surveillance of carbapenemases.…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although very few novel antibiotics are, or will be, available for the treatment of CPE, the most promising therapies involve combinations of a broad-spectrum ␤-lactam and novel ␤-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam) active on class A carbapenemases and on class D (for avibactam only) but not on MBLs (6,7). During the last 3 years, several methods have been developed for the detection of CPE, including (i) tests able to detect carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity (Carba NP test and derivatives [8][9][10], matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight [MALDI-TOF] protocols [11,12], Bogaerts-Yunus-Glupczynski [BYG] test [13], carbapenem inactivation method [CIM] test [14,15], and ␤ Carba [16]), (ii) immuno-chromatographic tests for the rapid detection of KPC, OXA-48-type, and NDM carbapenemases (17)(18)(19), (iii) combination disk diffusion assays (20), and (iv) molecular-based techniques that aim to detect the most widespread carbapenemase-encoding genes (21)(22)(23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%