2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2459-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GWASeq: targeted re-sequencing follow up to GWAS

Abstract: BackgroundFor the last decade the conceptual framework of the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) has dominated the investigation of human disease and other complex traits. While GWAS have been successful in identifying a large number of variants associated with various phenotypes, the overall amount of heritability explained by these variants remains small. This raises the question of how best to follow up on a GWAS, localize causal variants accounting for GWAS hits, and as a consequence explain more of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, GWASs were performed using only known genetic markers involved in both cases and healthy controls, the ability to identify novel pathogenesis is limited compared with direct sequencing (Marian and Belmont, 2011;Salomon et al, 2016). It is clear that the imbalance of the homeostasis between collagens and MMPs/TIMPs system is a key responsible for extracellular matrix (ECM) degeneration and structure and functions of aorta, and therefore may contribute to the pathogenesis of AD (Barbour et al, 2007;Theruvath et al, 2012;Tsamis et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, GWASs were performed using only known genetic markers involved in both cases and healthy controls, the ability to identify novel pathogenesis is limited compared with direct sequencing (Marian and Belmont, 2011;Salomon et al, 2016). It is clear that the imbalance of the homeostasis between collagens and MMPs/TIMPs system is a key responsible for extracellular matrix (ECM) degeneration and structure and functions of aorta, and therefore may contribute to the pathogenesis of AD (Barbour et al, 2007;Theruvath et al, 2012;Tsamis et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for the collection of DNA samples from caseprobands as well as their relatives, and the verification of reports of cancer by relatives rather than relying on selfreport only. This research includes the investigation of SNP associations, [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] genome panel testing 55 and statistical modelling of risk. 28,51,52 Many of these studies stemmed from the research within the CCFRC on syndromic classification of familial colorectal cancer, primarily the work leading to the description of 'familial colorectal cancer type X', the phenotype of MMRproficient colorectal cancer cases who fulfilled the Amsterdam Criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer, 13 which has become an accepted category of familial colorectal cancer.…”
Section: What Has It Found? Key Findings and Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the use of genotyping arrays developed to study a specific set of SNPs, such as the Immunochip for immune-relevant variants, and statistical approaches that can define a small subset of statically likely casual SNPs, known as a credible set, that can then undergo functional annotations through the use of data sets and online predictors. Fine mapping typically involves imputation [ 52 ] and targeted re-sequencing [ 53 ] with stepwise conditional analysis to define independent association signals within a locus [ 54 ]. To narrow down the associations to particular variants, calculating a posterior probability in a Bayesian approach can define a credible set [ 54 ].…”
Section: Fine Mapping and Resolving Likely Causal Variants From Gwasmentioning
confidence: 99%