2018
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort Profile: The Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort (CCFRC)

Abstract: Why was the cohort set up?Colorectal cancer has long been one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers in the world, with an estimated 1.4 million new cases diagnosed each year (9.8% of worldwide cancer diagnoses) and the cause of 694 000 deaths (8.5% of all worldwide cancer deaths) in 2012. 1 In 1996, as a commitment to reduce morbidity and mortality from this disease, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the U.S. National Institutes of Health invited investigators to apply for funding to establish a 'Coope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study cohort from the Colon Cancer Family Registry has been described in detail elsewhere. [21][22][23] Between 1998 and 2012, the Colon Cancer Family Registry recruited families via population-based probands, recently diagnosed with colorectal cancer, in state or regional population cancer registries in the United States (Washington, California, Arizona, Minnesota, Colorado, New Hampshire, North Carolina, and Hawaii), Australia (Victoria), and Canada (Ontario). In addition, clinic-based probands were enrolled from multiple-case families referred to family cancer clinics in the United States (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio), Canada (Ontario), Australia (Melbourne, Adelaide, Perth, Brisbane, Sydney, and Newcastle), and New Zealand (Auckland).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study cohort from the Colon Cancer Family Registry has been described in detail elsewhere. [21][22][23] Between 1998 and 2012, the Colon Cancer Family Registry recruited families via population-based probands, recently diagnosed with colorectal cancer, in state or regional population cancer registries in the United States (Washington, California, Arizona, Minnesota, Colorado, New Hampshire, North Carolina, and Hawaii), Australia (Victoria), and Canada (Ontario). In addition, clinic-based probands were enrolled from multiple-case families referred to family cancer clinics in the United States (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio), Canada (Ontario), Australia (Melbourne, Adelaide, Perth, Brisbane, Sydney, and Newcastle), and New Zealand (Auckland).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a retrospective case‐control study of population‐based cases and controls aged 40 to 49 years with and without incident CRC who were enrolled in the multisite Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) between 1998 and 2007. The design of the CCFR and process of evolution into the CCFR Cohort have been described in detail elsewhere 16,17 . Briefly, the CCFR was established to support studies of the etiology, prevention, and management of CRC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cases and unaffected controls were identified from population‐based and clinic‐based registries representing the spectrum of CRC risk. Baseline data collection for CRC cases and noncancer cases included detailed family history, diet and/or lifestyle questionnaires, clinical records, and biospecimens, which also have been detailed elsewhere 16,17 . Currently, the CCFR Cohort includes data from 42,489 participants from 15,049 families.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We calculated the distribution of predicted lifestyle risk using self-reported values for 10 factors from the Colorectal cancer RISk Predictor (CRISP) model ( 30 ) for 4747 control participants from the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry ( 31 ) who reported family history of CRC ( Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Table 1 , available online). Each person’s risk due to family history was based on number, degree of relatedness, and age at diagnosis of relatives with CRC ( Supplementary Methods , available online).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%