2016
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HGVS Recommendations for the Description of Sequence Variants: 2016 Update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
947
0
14

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,263 publications
(964 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(27 reference statements)
3
947
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Seventeen of the 22 human UGT transcripts encoding canonical and functional enzymes (referred to as v1 transcripts according to Human Genome Variation Society HGVS nomenclature) 14 were substantially expressed (> 2 FPKM) in at least one of the three tissue examined ( Fig.3; Table S1). Highest expression was measured in the normal liver and especially for UGT2B genes (> 400 FPKM for UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10 and UGT2B15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen of the 22 human UGT transcripts encoding canonical and functional enzymes (referred to as v1 transcripts according to Human Genome Variation Society HGVS nomenclature) 14 were substantially expressed (> 2 FPKM) in at least one of the three tissue examined ( Fig.3; Table S1). Highest expression was measured in the normal liver and especially for UGT2B genes (> 400 FPKM for UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10 and UGT2B15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when genomic DNA is sequenced, a genomic DNA sequence is the preferred reference and (by inference) when a protein sequence is reported, an amino acid sequence is the preferred reference. The working group further recommends the use of the recently introduced Locus Reference Genomic sequence (LRG) (http://www.lrg-sequence.org/; the LRG collaboration maintains and creates LRGs [6].…”
Section: Amyloid Fibril Protein Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The nomenclature adopted for the SNPs was based on the convention described by the Human Genome Variation Society (Den Dunnen et al, 2016). No SNPs were found in the coding sequence from the set of animals used in this study.…”
Section: Identification Of Snpsmentioning
confidence: 99%