2016
DOI: 10.3109/10641955.2015.1115059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACE gene in pregnancy complications: Insights into future vascular risk

Abstract: Our findings demonstrate a common genetic background shared by women with a history of vascular disorders and PMPCs; pregnancy may be considered a window to future cardiovascular risk; therefore, "non-classic" genetic biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction might allow one to identify women who could have a greater benefit for an early cardiovascular screening and prevention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the articles which studied other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and not PE, studies on offspring and those which were not original research were also excluded in the full-text screening stage. After further refinement, eight articles were removed for the following reasons: (i) two studies for using different cohorts for CVD and PE ( 20 , 37 ); (ii) one article for investigating different women with CVD and a history of PE, although from the same cohort ( 38 ); (iii) two for making conclusions on the shared risk of PE and CVD using genes predisposed to CVD from another study ( 39 , 40 ) and (iv) for not testing for CVD risk ( 39 , 40 ); (v) two for studying CVD risk in women with PE during delivery, but not conducting any follow-up research on CVD risk ( 41 , 42 ); and (vi) one study for not mentioning the number of women with PE ( 19 ). The included studies consisted of two studies on CVD endpoints following PE ( 35 , 36 ) and four on CVD risk factors following PE ( 37 40 ) (see Supplementary Tables S6 – S11 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the articles which studied other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and not PE, studies on offspring and those which were not original research were also excluded in the full-text screening stage. After further refinement, eight articles were removed for the following reasons: (i) two studies for using different cohorts for CVD and PE ( 20 , 37 ); (ii) one article for investigating different women with CVD and a history of PE, although from the same cohort ( 38 ); (iii) two for making conclusions on the shared risk of PE and CVD using genes predisposed to CVD from another study ( 39 , 40 ) and (iv) for not testing for CVD risk ( 39 , 40 ); (v) two for studying CVD risk in women with PE during delivery, but not conducting any follow-up research on CVD risk ( 41 , 42 ); and (vi) one study for not mentioning the number of women with PE ( 19 ). The included studies consisted of two studies on CVD endpoints following PE ( 35 , 36 ) and four on CVD risk factors following PE ( 37 40 ) (see Supplementary Tables S6 – S11 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous clinical study, lower maternal and fetal Ang-(1-7) levels in plasma were at high risk for preterm birth [20]. Compared with healthy pregnant women, ACE D allele in pregnant women had an increased risk for giving SGA babies [47]. In a study from Brazil, The Ang II and ACE levels in plasma of boys who were born as SGA were higher (20% of increased levels) than those in boys at term birth [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the articles which studied other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and not PE, studies on offspring and those which were not original research were also excluded in the full-text screening stage. After further refinement, eight articles were removed for the following reasons: (i) two studies for using different cohorts for CVD and PE (19,29) ; (ii) one article for investigating different women with CVD and a history of PE, although from the same cohort (30) ; (iii) two for making conclusions on the shared risk of PE and CVD using genes predisposed to CVD from another study (31,32) and (iv) for not testing for CVD risk (31,32) ; (v) two for studying CVD risk in women with PE during delivery, but not conducting any follow-up research on CVD risk (33,34) ; and (vi) one study for not mentioning the number of women with PE (18) (see Supplementary Tables S1-S6 for details). The included studies consisted of two studies on CVD endpoints following PE (35,36) and four on CVD risk factors following PE (37)(38)(39)(40) (see Supplementary Tables S1-S6).…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality scores of six included studies (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) and the excluded eight studies (18,19,29,(30)(31)(32)(33)41) that reached the final screening stage are shown in Supplementary Tables S1-S3. The six studies that passed the final screening were all case-control design.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%