2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscope Holders in Cranial Neurosurgery: Part I—Technology, Trends, and Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While several neurosurgeons use free-hand endoscopy, some prefer holders for precise, stable positioning, especially for lengthy or more complex procedures. 3,4 Freehand guidance offers flexibility but carries the risk of inadvertent movements that may result in injuring neural structures. 1 Because the endoscope is guided by the surgeon's hand at one end (proximal), it can be regarded as a lever at the distal end.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several neurosurgeons use free-hand endoscopy, some prefer holders for precise, stable positioning, especially for lengthy or more complex procedures. 3,4 Freehand guidance offers flexibility but carries the risk of inadvertent movements that may result in injuring neural structures. 1 Because the endoscope is guided by the surgeon's hand at one end (proximal), it can be regarded as a lever at the distal end.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, as mentioned above, there are several difficulties in neurosurgery: limited degrees of freedom on the part of the neurosurgeon, loss of depth perception, lack of flexibility to reach anatomically complicated spots, downward drift, and brain shift, among others [14]. Due to the problems in this field, robotic systems have been used to solve some of them.…”
Section: Robotics In the Neurosurgery Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there have been various approaches to ease bimanual action by endoscope holding arms during the last decades [1,11], Friedrich et al 2019). The basic design consists of a multi-membered arm with either mechanical, pneumatic or electromagnetic locks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, several disadvantages have been revealed in existing products [1,11]: downwards drift of the arm, high costs of more elaborated holders, iatrogenic trauma through the fixed endonasal endoscope in the patient's head, bulky design of the arm and inflexibility through limited degrees of freedom compared to free hand movement. This might be why, by now no of the current endoscope holding devices could prevail neither in otolaryngology nor in neurosurgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%