2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer Cell Analyses at the Single Cell-Level Using Electroactive Microwell Array Device

Abstract: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), shed from primary tumors and disseminated into peripheral blood, are playing a major role in metastasis. Even after isolation of CTCs from blood, the target cells are mixed with a population of other cell types. Here, we propose a new method for analyses of cell mixture at the single-cell level using a microfluidic device that contains arrayed electroactive microwells. Dielectrophoretic (DEP) force, induced by the electrodes patterned on the bottom surface of the microwells, all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plotting single‐cell data of cell diameter and penetration length for MCF‐10A, MCF‐7, HeLa, and PC3 cells revealed strong linear correlations between cell diameter D cell and penetration length L under different gauge pressures applied to the elasticity microcytometer (Figure a). Ensemble averaged data of cell diameter and penetration length were further analyzed, suggesting that MCF‐10A, MCF‐7, HeLa, and PC3 cells had average diameters of 14.88 ± 0.56 μm, 19.81 ± 0.76 μm, 16.01 ± 0.62 μm, and 19.85 ± 0.69 μm, respectively (Figure b), agreeing well with previous reports . Importantly, MCF‐10A cells could remain trapped inside confining channels of the elasticity microcytometer with the gauge pressure up to 400 Pa, whereas MCF‐7, HeLa, and PC3 cells flew through confining channels with gauge pressure > 200 Pa (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Plotting single‐cell data of cell diameter and penetration length for MCF‐10A, MCF‐7, HeLa, and PC3 cells revealed strong linear correlations between cell diameter D cell and penetration length L under different gauge pressures applied to the elasticity microcytometer (Figure a). Ensemble averaged data of cell diameter and penetration length were further analyzed, suggesting that MCF‐10A, MCF‐7, HeLa, and PC3 cells had average diameters of 14.88 ± 0.56 μm, 19.81 ± 0.76 μm, 16.01 ± 0.62 μm, and 19.85 ± 0.69 μm, respectively (Figure b), agreeing well with previous reports . Importantly, MCF‐10A cells could remain trapped inside confining channels of the elasticity microcytometer with the gauge pressure up to 400 Pa, whereas MCF‐7, HeLa, and PC3 cells flew through confining channels with gauge pressure > 200 Pa (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Kobayashi et al. used three different kinds of biochemical assays (immunostaining, viability/apoptosis, and FISH) for cancer cell discrimination after capturing cells by electro‐activated microwells . Most of published articles relied on injection of expensive biochemical reagents, microscopy, and molecular analysis methods to find cell types and their properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occasional trapping of more than one cell in the same well is dependent on the level of the dielectrophoresis trapping force applied in combination with the flow rate and is inevitably happening using a force strong enough to ensure a high trapping efficiency. It was observed that this phenomenon was more frequent in the beginning of the trapping area36. Despite of this it was never challenging to identify and count the trapped cells as the shallow wells will not allow cells to be trapped directly above each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%