Abstract:Plant pathogens have the capacity to manipulate the host immune system through the secretion of effectors. We identified 27 putative effector proteins encoded in the genome of the maize anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum graminicola that are likely to target the host's nucleus, as they simultaneously contain sequence signatures for secretion and nuclear localization. We functionally characterized one protein, identified as CgEP1. This protein is synthesized during the early stages of disease development and i… Show more
“…In our study, neither SignalP nor WoLF PSORT indicated the presence of a signal peptide in this protein. A second candidate nuclear effector identified in [79], GLRG_03517, was similarly not predicted to have a signal peptide in our study. A third putative NLS effector from that study (GLRG_08510) was on our list of NCPs as a predicted SSP, but not as a nuclear protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Some of these NCPs may also specifically target the host nucleus: for example, one of the predicted nuclear proteins in C. graminicola was GLRG_04079, aka. CgEP1, recently characterized as an essential C. graminicola effector that is targeted to the plant nucleus, with both a secretion signal and a nuclear localization signal (NLS) [79] (Additional file 5: Table S4). In our study, neither SignalP nor WoLF PSORT indicated the presence of a signal peptide in this protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This illustrates why localization predictions should be experimentally confirmed. The rest of the NLS effectors identified in [79] are conserved in CgSl1, and thus they were not among the NCPs.…”
Background
Colletotrichum graminicola and C. sublineola cause anthracnose leaf and stalk diseases of maize and sorghum, respectively. In spite of their close evolutionary relationship, the two species are completely host-specific. Host specificity is often attributed to pathogen virulence factors, including specialized secondary metabolites (SSM), and small-secreted protein (SSP) effectors. Genes relevant to these categories were manually annotated in two co-occurring, contemporaneous strains of C. graminicola and C. sublineola. A comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis was performed to address the evolutionary relationships among these and other divergent gene families in the two strains.ResultsInoculation of maize with C. sublineola, or of sorghum with C. graminicola, resulted in rapid plant cell death at, or just after, the point of penetration. The two fungal genomes were very similar. More than 50% of the assemblies could be directly aligned, and more than 80% of the gene models were syntenous. More than 90% of the predicted proteins had orthologs in both species. Genes lacking orthologs in the other species (non-conserved genes) included many predicted to encode SSM-associated proteins and SSPs. Other common groups of non-conserved proteins included transporters, transcription factors, and CAZymes. Only 32 SSP genes appeared to be specific to C. graminicola, and 21 to C. sublineola. None of the SSM-associated genes were lineage-specific. Two different strains of C. graminicola, and three strains of C. sublineola, differed in no more than 1% percent of gene sequences from one another.ConclusionsEfficient non-host recognition of C. sublineola by maize, and of C. graminicola by sorghum, was observed in epidermal cells as a rapid deployment of visible resistance responses and plant cell death. Numerous non-conserved SSP and SSM-associated predicted proteins that could play a role in this non-host recognition were identified. Additional categories of genes that were also highly divergent suggested an important role for co-evolutionary adaptation to specific host environmental factors, in addition to aspects of initial recognition, in host specificity. This work provides a foundation for future functional studies aimed at clarifying the roles of these proteins, and the possibility of manipulating them to improve management of these two economically important diseases.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3457-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
“…In our study, neither SignalP nor WoLF PSORT indicated the presence of a signal peptide in this protein. A second candidate nuclear effector identified in [79], GLRG_03517, was similarly not predicted to have a signal peptide in our study. A third putative NLS effector from that study (GLRG_08510) was on our list of NCPs as a predicted SSP, but not as a nuclear protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Some of these NCPs may also specifically target the host nucleus: for example, one of the predicted nuclear proteins in C. graminicola was GLRG_04079, aka. CgEP1, recently characterized as an essential C. graminicola effector that is targeted to the plant nucleus, with both a secretion signal and a nuclear localization signal (NLS) [79] (Additional file 5: Table S4). In our study, neither SignalP nor WoLF PSORT indicated the presence of a signal peptide in this protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This illustrates why localization predictions should be experimentally confirmed. The rest of the NLS effectors identified in [79] are conserved in CgSl1, and thus they were not among the NCPs.…”
Background
Colletotrichum graminicola and C. sublineola cause anthracnose leaf and stalk diseases of maize and sorghum, respectively. In spite of their close evolutionary relationship, the two species are completely host-specific. Host specificity is often attributed to pathogen virulence factors, including specialized secondary metabolites (SSM), and small-secreted protein (SSP) effectors. Genes relevant to these categories were manually annotated in two co-occurring, contemporaneous strains of C. graminicola and C. sublineola. A comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis was performed to address the evolutionary relationships among these and other divergent gene families in the two strains.ResultsInoculation of maize with C. sublineola, or of sorghum with C. graminicola, resulted in rapid plant cell death at, or just after, the point of penetration. The two fungal genomes were very similar. More than 50% of the assemblies could be directly aligned, and more than 80% of the gene models were syntenous. More than 90% of the predicted proteins had orthologs in both species. Genes lacking orthologs in the other species (non-conserved genes) included many predicted to encode SSM-associated proteins and SSPs. Other common groups of non-conserved proteins included transporters, transcription factors, and CAZymes. Only 32 SSP genes appeared to be specific to C. graminicola, and 21 to C. sublineola. None of the SSM-associated genes were lineage-specific. Two different strains of C. graminicola, and three strains of C. sublineola, differed in no more than 1% percent of gene sequences from one another.ConclusionsEfficient non-host recognition of C. sublineola by maize, and of C. graminicola by sorghum, was observed in epidermal cells as a rapid deployment of visible resistance responses and plant cell death. Numerous non-conserved SSP and SSM-associated predicted proteins that could play a role in this non-host recognition were identified. Additional categories of genes that were also highly divergent suggested an important role for co-evolutionary adaptation to specific host environmental factors, in addition to aspects of initial recognition, in host specificity. This work provides a foundation for future functional studies aimed at clarifying the roles of these proteins, and the possibility of manipulating them to improve management of these two economically important diseases.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3457-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
“…Three of them were also found in the Fg exudates (fuGraFG1chr3G262700.1, fuGraFG1chr1G376300.1, and FGSG_03017) and two showed significant abundance changes during the infection (fuGraFG1chr2G224300.1 and fuGraFG1chr3G262700.1). Fungal proteins can be located in the plant nucleus to drive the success of the disease (Robin et al, ; Vargas et al, ). Such Fg proteins could partly explain the significant enrichment in wheat of FHB‐regulated proteins involved in nucleic acid binding and in translation.…”
Fungal plant diseases are controlled by a complex molecular dialogue that involves pathogen effectors able to manipulate plant susceptibility factors at the earliest stages of the interaction. By probing the wheat–Fusarium graminearum pathosystem, we profiled the coregulations of the fungal and plant proteins shaping the molecular responses of a 96‐hr‐long infection's dynamics. Although no symptoms were yet detectable, fungal biomass swiftly increased along with an extremely diverse set of secreted proteins and candidate effectors supposed to target key plant organelles. Some showed to be early accumulated during the interaction or already present in spores, otherwise stored in germinating spores and detectable in an in vitro F. graminearum exudate. Wheat responses were swiftly set up and were evidenced before any visible symptom. Significant wheat protein abundance changes co‐occurred along with the accumulation of putative secreted fungal proteins and predicted effectors. Regulated wheat proteins were closely connected to basal cellular processes occurring during spikelet ontogeny, and particular coregulation patterns were evidenced between chloroplast proteins and fungal proteins harbouring a predicted chloroplast transit peptide. The described plant and fungal coordinated responses provide a resourceful set of data and expand our understanding of the wheat–F. graminearum interaction.
“…Another criterion used to identify putative effectors from obligate intracellular pathogens has been the presence of nuclear localization domains, which allows effectors to directly modulate plant gene expression [58,59]. For many years, effectors capable of migrating to the plant cell nucleus have only been described in bacteria [58–60], but more recently these motifs together with nuclear localization of effectors has been described in fungi [61,62] and nematodes [63]. In bioinformatics pipelines designed to identify putative effectors, the inclusion of steps to remove proteins containing subcellular localization signals will remove these effectors, although researchers could analyze these amino acid sequences directly using the online tool TargetP 1.1 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP).…”
Section: Where and How To Look For Effectors?mentioning
Clubroot is an economically important disease affecting Brassica plants worldwide. Plasmodiophora brassicae is the protist pathogen associated with the disease, and its soil-borne obligate parasitic nature has impeded studies related to its biology and the mechanisms involved in its infection of the plant host. The identification of effector proteins is key to understanding how the pathogen manipulates the plant’s immune response and the genes involved in resistance. After more than 140 years studying clubroot and P. brassicae, very little is known about the effectors playing key roles in the infection process and subsequent disease progression. Here we analyze the information available for identified effectors and suggest several features of effector genes that can be used in the search for others. Based on the information presented in this review, we propose a comprehensive bioinformatics pipeline for effector identification and provide a list of the bioinformatics tools available for such.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.