The prevention and management of chronic disease in primary care: recommendations from a knowledge translation meeting

Abstract

BackgroundSeven chronic disease prevention and management programs were implemented across Quebec with funding support from a provincial-private industry funding initiative. Given the complexity of implementing integrated primary care chronic disease management programs, a knowledge transfer meeting was held to share experiences across programs and synthesize common challenges and success factors for implementation.MethodsThe knowledge translation meeting was held in February 2014 in Montreal, Canada. Seventy-five participants consisting of 15 clinicians, 14 researchers, 31 knowledge users, and 15 representatives from the funding agencies were broken up into groups of 10 or 11 and conducted a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis on either the implementation or the evaluation of these chronic disease management programs. Results were reported back to the larger group during a plenary and recorded. Audiotapes were transcribed and summarized using pragmatic thematic analysis.Results and discussionStrengths to leverage for the implementation of the seven programs include: (1) synergy between clinical and research teams; (2) stakeholders working together; (3) motivation of clinicians; and (4) the fact that the programs are evidence-based. Weaknesses to address include: (1) insufficient resources; (2) organizational change within the clinical sites; (3) lack of referrals from primary care physicians; and (4) lack of access to programs. Strengths to leverage for the evaluation of these programs include: (1) engagement of stakeholders and (2) sharing of knowledge between clinical sites. Weaknesses to address include: (1) lack of referrals; (2) difficulties with data collection; and (3) difficulties in identifying indicators and control groups. Opportunities for both themes include: (1) fostering new and existing partnerships and stakeholder relations; (2) seizing funding opportunities; (3) knowledge transfer; (4) supporting the transformation of professional roles; (5) expand the use of health information technology; and (6) conduct cost evaluations. Fifteen recommendations related to mobilisation of primary care physicians, support for the transformation of professional roles, and strategies aimed at facilitating the implementation and evaluation of chronic disease management programs were formulated based on the discussions at this knowledge translation event.ConclusionThe results from this knowledge translation day will help inform the sustainability of these seven chronic disease management programs in Quebec and the implementation and evaluation of similar programs elsewhere.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1514-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany

“…Alongside the regular care of enrolled patients, doctors who participate in DMPs receive mandatory training courses. Moreover, medical practices that offer treatment within the framework of DMPs must fulfil set quality requirements; this can lead to changes in the practice’s workflow [ 10 , 11 ]. Depending upon the program, structured training courses are also offered to patients in support of their treatment and/or for the purposes of prevention.…”

“…The DMP objectives cannot be achieved without the substantial participation of general practitioners as primary care providers with access to a broad, unselected patient base [ 10 , 11 , 22 ]. In this respect, general practitioners play a key role in the recruitment of patients, ensuring compliance and coordination of the treatment process [ 7 , 22 ].…”

Changes in the management of urinary tract infections in women: impact of the new recommendations on antibiotic prescribing behavior in France, between 2014 and 2019

“…Physicians could be included in the groups involved in guideline drafting to make them accessible to all and as close as possible to the real practice conditions. All the main concerned parties (clinicians, researchers, knowledge users, and institutions) should be brought together to identify common challenges and success factors for the implementation of a new program [ 49 ].…”

Physical activity and breast cancer: Results of a focus group to devise novel exercise interventions for women with breast cancer

“…[40] Research projects, such as this study, which incorporate stakeholders in the development of these needed interventions, is one approach to ensure the collegial support of various HCPs within the institution to drive these programs. [40,41] With the support of various stakeholders within institutions the sustainability and effectiveness of promoting behavioural change is likely to be enhanced.…”