Effects of a Web-Based Personalized Intervention on Physical Activity in European Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

BackgroundThe high prevalence of physical inactivity worldwide calls for innovative and more effective ways to promote physical activity (PA). There are limited objective data on the effectiveness of Web-based personalized feedback on increasing PA in adults.ObjectiveIt is hypothesized that providing personalized advice based on PA measured objectively alongside diet, phenotype, or genotype information would lead to larger and more sustained changes in PA, compared with nonpersonalized advice.MethodsA total of 1607 adults in seven European countries were randomized to either a control group (nonpersonalized advice, Level 0, L0) or to one of three personalized groups receiving personalized advice via the Internet based on current PA plus diet (Level 1, L1), PA plus diet and phenotype (Level 2, L2), or PA plus diet, phenotype, and genotype (Level 3, L3). PA was measured for 6 months using triaxial accelerometers, and self-reported using the Baecke questionnaire. Outcomes were objective and self-reported PA after 3 and 6 months.ResultsWhile 1270 participants (85.81% of 1480 actual starters) completed the 6-month trial, 1233 (83.31%) self-reported PA at both baseline and month 6, but only 730 (49.32%) had sufficient objective PA data at both time points. For the total cohort after 6 months, a greater improvement in self-reported total PA (P=.02) and PA during leisure (nonsport) (P=.03) was observed in personalized groups compared with the control group. For individuals advised to increase PA, we also observed greater improvements in those two self-reported indices (P=.006 and P=.008, respectively) with increased personalization of the advice (L2 and L3 vs L1). However, there were no significant differences in accelerometer results between personalized and control groups, and no significant effect of adding phenotypic or genotypic information to the tailored feedback at month 3 or 6. After 6 months, there were small but significant improvements in the objectively measured physical activity level (P<.05), moderate PA (P<.01), and sedentary time (P<.001) for individuals advised to increase PA, but these changes were similar across all groups.ConclusionsDifferent levels of personalization produced similar small changes in objective PA. We found no evidence that personalized advice is more effective than conventional “one size fits all” guidelines to promote changes in PA in our Web-based intervention when PA was measured objectively. Based on self-reports, PA increased to a greater extent with more personalized advice. Thus, it is crucial to measure PA objectively in any PA intervention study.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01530139; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01530139 (Archived by WebCite at: http://www.webcitation.org/6XII1QwHz)

Key Components in eHealth Interventions Combining Self-Tracking and Persuasive eCoaching to Promote a Healthier Lifestyle: A Scoping Review

“…Most studies were carried out in the United States [ 32 , 33 , 35 , 37 , 40 , 46 , 49 - 52 , 57 , 60 , 63 ], followed by the Netherlands [ 34 , 45 , 53 , 55 , 56 , 62 ].…”

Factores asociados a sedentarismo en Chile: evidencia de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2009-2010

“…A pesar de que el tipo de información otorgada por la ENS 2009-10 no permite establecer relación causa-efecto, sin duda estos hallazgos podrían ser de gran utilidad para definir y aplicar intervenciones efectivas orientadas a disminuir el sedentarismo, sobre todo en grupos vulnerables. Si bien las intervenciones generalizadas tienen un efecto limitado en modificar el estilo de vida de la población 31,32 , intervenciones más personalizadas, diseñadas para individuos con mayor riesgo de ser altamente sedentarios, podrían ser efectivas para reducir los niveles de sedentarismo [33][34][35][36] . Por ejemplo, para el caso de personas con ingresos económicos más altos, y que poseen mayor nivel educacional, las alternativas más eficaces podrían ser la inclusión de pausas activas en el trabajo y el transporte activo.…”

Associations of vitamin D status with dietary intakes and physical activity levels among adults from seven European countries: the Food4Me study

“…Activity energy expenditure (AEE) and time spent in PAs of different intensity were derived from accelerometers [29]. Classification into sedentary activities and light-, moderate-and vigorous-intensity PA was based on the application of thresholds for AEE [29]. Time spent in sedentary activities, as well as in light-, moderate-and vigorous-intensity PA was calculated.…”